My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/12/1982
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1982
>
Agenda - Council - 01/12/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:27:29 PM
Creation date
5/21/2004 12:09:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/12/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />SITING NEW SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA: <br /> QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS <br /> <br />Question: What's this "waste crisis" I keep hearing about? My trash is still picked up every <br /> week. So what's the problem'? <br /> <br />Answer: There is a mounting problem, although you may not have noticed it. We are <br /> running out of places to put waste. <br /> <br />Q. What kind of waste? <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />It's called "mixed municipal waste" or "solid waste." It's the trash your refuse hauler <br />picks up... bottles, cans, old newspapers, food wastes. ,, <br /> <br />Why can't we go on burying solid waste as we've always done? <br /> <br />Currently, solid waste is carried to 11 sanitary landfills located around the Twin Cities <br />Region. <br /> <br />But these landfills are filling up rapidly and no new landfills have been built since the <br />1960s. By 1986, all the landfills in the Region are expected to run out of space. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />LOOKING FOR SOLUTIONS <br /> <br />Why not expand existing landfills? <br /> <br />Some of them already have been expanded. In other cases, the lay of the land doesn't <br />permit expansion. <br /> <br />Also, some pose a potential threat of pollution to groundwater lying underneath. <br /> <br />Why not build new landfills? <br /> <br />Finding new locations for landfills isn't easy. Most people don't want landfills located <br />near their homes or farms. People are concerned about the risk of groundwater <br />pollution, increased traffic on nearby roads, flying litter blowing off trash trucks and <br />the unsightly appearance of landfills. <br /> <br />Why not recycle waste material instead of throwing it away? <br /> <br />That's a partial solution. Recycling can substantially reduce the amount of waste going <br />to landfills. The Metropolitan Council estimates that about 14 percent of all trash is <br />recycled now. However, recycling will never completely eliminate the need for landfills. <br />There will always be some wastes that can't be recycled. <br /> <br />Q. Why not recover energy from solid waste by burning it? <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Ao <br /> <br />Qo <br /> <br />Energy recovery is our best solution in the long run. But facilities are expensive and take <br />years to develop.:; <br /> <br />How much waste could recycling and energy recovery reduce? <br /> <br />Planners think that 70 to 90 percent of wastes can be diverted annually from landfills <br />by the year 2000. Glass bottles, aluminum cans and paper can be recycled into new <br />.bottles, cans and paper. Trash can be burned to recover usable heat energy or composted.. <br />'Producing less waste in the first place can reduce the need for landfills. For example, <br /> <br />I 1 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.