My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/12/1982
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1982
>
Agenda - Council - 01/12/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:27:29 PM
Creation date
5/21/2004 12:09:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/12/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />BACKGROUND ON DISPOSAL <br /> <br />"RESOURCE RECOVERY", AS THE TERM USED IN <br />OUR REPORT, REFERS TO THE RECOVERY OF ENER- <br />GY FROM WASTE MATERIALS THROUGH HlGH TECH- <br />NOLOGY PROCESSES THAT INVOLVE INCINERATION. <br /> <br />The recovered energy is generally used to heat buildings, pro- <br />duce electricity or dhve manufacturing processes. Today, <br />there are appro×imately 40 resource recovery plants in the <br />Uniled States; some are built and operating, some are con- <br />strucled bu! inoperative, and some are still in the planning <br />or construction stage. <br /> <br />In Minnesota, a resource recovery plant has been built in <br />Duluth. Plants are being proposed in the cities of Red Wing, <br />Collegeville, Saint Paul, and in Hennepin County. <br /> <br />In the Twin Cities, resource recovery facilities are to be plan- <br />ned along with the implmnentation of other policies as part <br />of a larger solid waste management program whose primary <br />goal is to abate the need to bury solid waste in landfills. <br />Other abatement policies that are included in the program <br />are: 1) waste reduction, which involves trying to reduce the <br />amount of waste produced, either by changing product de- <br />signs or consumer behavior, 2) mechanical volume reduc- <br />tion, which can involve bailing techniques that increase the <br />density of waste or shredding of waste to reduce its volume, <br />and 3) source separation, which usually involves recycling. <br />efforts by homeowners, businesses, and governmental <br />offices. <br /> <br />THERE ARE THREE BASIC TYPES OF RESOLIRCE RE- <br />COVERY FACILITIES. THEY CAN BE DISTINGLRSHED <br />BY THE AMOUNT OF PROCESSING THAT OCCURS BE- <br />FORE WASTE IS INCINERATED. <br /> <br />Mass Burning Facilities <br /> <br />In lhese facilities little or no processing of the waste is done <br />prior to incineration. Waste is simply dumped into the <br />facility and burned. There are over.gOO such facilities in the <br />world today. In the United States examples of mass burn- <br />ing facilities can be found in Nashville, TN, Hampton, VA, <br />and Saugus, MA. <br /> <br />Semi-suspension Plants <br /> <br />In these facilities some separation of materials is done me- <br />chanically to recover metals and non-burnable waste, prior to <br />incineration. In the United States, examples of such plants <br />can be found in Akron, OH; Niagara Falls, NY; and Hamil- <br />· ton, Ontario. ~ <br /> <br />Refuse4erived Fuel Facilities (RI)F) <br /> <br />These facilities are intended to produce a fuel from refuse <br />which can then be used as an alternative fuel in conventional <br />fossil fuel-fired energy systems. RDF plants involve a higher <br />degree of processing than do the other two types of plants. <br />Sometimes this processing involves shredding the refuse into <br />small (six inch squares, for example) pieces. Examples of <br />RDF plants can be found in Ames, IA and Duluth. <br /> <br />TODAY, .THE PRIMARY METHOD OF DISPOSING OF <br />SOLID WASTE IN THE TWIN CITIES, AND MINNESOTA, <br />IS BURYING THE WASTE IN LANDFILLS. <br /> <br />There axe currently 11 sanitary landf'flls operating in the <br />Twin City metropolitan area. Approximately 90% of the <br />waste generated in the regioh is disposed of in these landfills.' <br />About 8% of the region's waste is currently recycled. <br /> <br />Today, all the landfills are privately owned. Three of the <br />landfills, all owned by Browning-Ferris, take in aPproxi- <br />mately 60% of the region's waste. Negotiations are also <br />underway which could make Browning-Ferris the owner of <br />a fourth landftll here. Consequently, there is only limited <br />competition in disposal today. <br /> <br />There are also seven transfer stations operating in the region. <br />Refuse haulers can bring their waste to a transfer station, <br />where it is then moved into trucks of larger capacity for <br />transport to a landfill. <br /> <br />According to Metropolitan Council studies, at current waste <br />generation rates and current licensed landf'dl capacity, the re- <br />gion's existing landfills will all be full by the end of the <br />1980s. Some of the landfills here are located on sites large <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.