Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />i <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />SUBJ: <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />City Administrator <br /> <br />Building Official <br /> <br />Alternate Energy/Energy Conservation - City Hall <br /> <br />December 31, 1981 <br /> <br />Several weeks ago, a representative of a solar energy company provided the <br />City with information about solar energy as an alternate energy source to <br />conserve energy. At that time, it was clear that there was an interest in <br />alternate energy as a conservation method. Since the initial presentation, <br />subsequent discussions have expanded to include energy conservation in the <br />building as it exist~ which has led to some confusion as the two are only <br />vaguely related. Energy conservation could be as simple as turning off un- <br />needed lightin~ while alternate energy would mean making major costly revi- <br />sions to the system. <br /> <br />Ail this has led to the question of whether or not it would be advisable <br />for the City of Ramsey to have an energy audit on the City Hall. As ~ have <br />previously stated, I don't feel the audit is justified, as I fail to see <br />where a substantial savings can be attained. Further, I don't believe an <br />energy audit would indicate what amount of savings could be anticipated. <br />As previously stated, I don't see where we could save any large amounts of <br />energ~ as the structure was built to comply with the energy code. However, <br />I do not profess to have all the answers and there may be something I'm <br />completely overlooking. The things I see as potential areas of savings are <br />as follows. Some are very radical and would completely change the aesthetics <br />of the building. For those areas, please note that less radical alternates <br />are recommended. <br /> <br />1) <br /> <br />Dr__~qq?ped Ceiling Lobby Area: This item would, in my estimation, be <br />the largest energy saver. The high ceiling with no air movement <br />results in stratification of some very warm air against the ceiling <br />and upper windows. An insulated dropped ceiling would eliminate <br />this problem, but would also destroy the aesthetics of the inverted <br />trusses. <br /> <br />The alternate to this would be to place some larg~ cabana fans in <br />this area. They would not only pull the hot ceiling air down and <br />reduce heat loss, but they would also be aesthetically.pleasing. <br /> <br />Fans of same type should be placed in other areas of the building <br />to circulate.~.[i.e. Fire Barn, Hose Tower). <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />Air Exchanqe - Make U~ Air: As you know, the building's heat is <br />provided by baseboard hot water. However, to avoid stagnation, <br />there is a large fan in the boiler room that runs constantly to <br /> <br /> <br />