My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/22/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 12/22/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:41:13 PM
Creation date
5/24/2004 7:50:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/22/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Alternative #2 Deny the Rezonin~ Request <br /> <br />A second alternative would be for the city to deny the rezoning request on the <br />basis that it does not conform to the existing or proposed Comprehensive Plan <br />or Zoning Ordinance. In addition, the city offical would then presumably <br />suggest that the developer locate the commercial project further south in the <br />Urban Service area. This would be similar to what was done previously in <br />relation to the proposal for the medical and dental clinics in the area. <br /> <br />Alternative #3 Amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance Before <br />Approving Project <br /> <br />A third alternative available would be to pass a moratorium ordinance for a <br />specified period of time (3-6 months) for all commercial developments and <br />then take steps to amend the Zoning Ordinance by rewriting and clarifying the <br />various commercial districts and possibly create a seperate neighborhood <br />commercial district where limited commercial uses would be allowed. This would <br />allow the city to grant rezoning for neighborhood commercial developments with- <br />out the problem of these developments'expanding to large commercial develop- <br />ments in the future which could lead to leap-frog developments and may result <br />in demands for urban facilities and services that would be difficult to provide. <br /> <br />Of the three alternatives, the third alternative would seem to be the most <br />advisable at this time. While it may bold up the project for a certain period <br />of time, it may lead to a more desirable solution for the city as well as the <br />developer. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.