Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />MINNESOTA CONFE~J{NCE ON SMALL BUSINESS <br /> <br /> November 13- 14, 1981 <br /> <br />TAX <br /> <br />Final Reco~mne ndat ions <br /> <br />RECO~4;4 J']NDA'EI ON ~ <br /> <br />5o5 (1) <br /> <br />Worker's Compensation should be reformed so that: <br /> <br />"Work Place" injuries are clearly defined to reflect only <br />accidents "clearly" involving the employees work in order to <br />restrict liberal court interpretations. <br /> <br />Benefits are based on real wages lost and medical reimburse- <br />ment plus rehabilitation if necessary. Lump sum benefits <br />and permanent disability, either partial or full, based on <br />loss of body functions, would be eliminated. The law should <br />be patterned after Florida's wage loss system as established <br />in 1979, rather than using Wisconsin as a model. <br /> <br />Ail benefit payments are amnuity type payments. That is, all <br />lump sum payments should be eliminated in favor of weekly or <br />monthly payments. <br /> <br />Statutes of limitations on claims are reinstated. <br /> <br />The Worker's Compensation Court of Appeals has equal represen- <br />tation of worker and employer groups. <br /> <br />Complete and absolute apportionment of pre-existing conditions <br />are included. <br /> <br />370(2) <br /> <br />The Unemployment Fund deficit should be reduced by: <br /> <br />a) Bringing Minnesota Unemployment Compensation standards <br /> into strict conformance with Federal law.. <br /> <br />b) Lengthening the minimum work period from 15 weeks to <br /> 20 weeks before an employee would qualify for benefits. <br /> <br />c) <br /> <br />Reducing unemployment benefits for wage earners earning <br />more than $15,000 per year by adopting the following <br />rule: Each employee will receive credit for wages earned <br />up to $15,000. Wages earned over $15,000 would be de- <br />ducted from the $15,000 limit creating a proportional <br />decrease in the weekly benefit amount. <br /> <br /> <br />