Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />i <br />! <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />1981 MUNICIPAL STAS.~E AID NEEDS REPORT <br /> <br />_.C. pmparison of Total 1981 to the Tentative 1982 Appor~tionment <br /> <br /> Comparing the actual 1981 to the tentative 1982 total apportionment, <br />we find that 59 municipalities increase, and 50 decrease. <br /> <br />The following cities had increases which exceeded ten percent: <br /> <br />Arden Hills Elk River Plymouth <br />Blaine Ham Lake Ramsey <br />B~ooklyn Park Hibbing Shakopee <br />Burnsville Inver Grove Heights Shoreview <br />Champlin Lakeville Was ec a <br />Chaska Little Canada Willmar <br />Crystal .. Maple Grove Woodbury <br /> Oakdale <br /> <br /> Columbia Heights, Richfield and Robbinsdale were the only cities <br />which had decreases exceeding ten percent. Ely, Luverne, Pipestone and <br />St. Paul Park all decreased 34 percent, because of the law which gives <br />them 66 percent of their 1981 sl!otment. _ <br /> <br /> This tentative apportionment is only for comparison purposes. The <br />actual allotment will be determined by the Commissioner in January of <br />1982. <br /> <br />-54- <br /> <br /> <br />