My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/13/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 10/13/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:40:11 PM
Creation date
5/24/2004 9:12:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/13/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I 1612~/J~i oneer Building/ <br /> ~~'~ · (612) 224-2848 · ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 <br />! <br /> <br />October 2, 1981 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />City Council <br />City of Ramsey <br />County t~ighway 5 <br />Ramsey, M~nnesota <br /> <br />55303 <br /> <br />In re: Ja,mes Refrigeration <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Gentlemen: <br /> <br />Our office has cormunicated with Drs. Anderson and Austin numerous times <br />with regard to joint easement over the South line of their property and <br />the horth line of the proposed ~rx Addition. They have, on more than one <br />occasion, agreed to a joint easement over that area, and since have re- <br />tracted it a number of times. We have been absolutely unable to work out <br />any arrangement with them. Their lawyer, John Berglund, has communicated <br />with me that no arrangement can be made unless we pay a substantial sum of <br />money to them. Under the circumstances, this is not possible. Accordingly, <br />we call this to your attention and when looking at the site plan you should <br />note that we will separate the two roads that come in off Highway 5. There <br />will be only one road into the Marx Addition property and that will be an <br />entry road and an exit road for service to the proposed superette. This is <br />not a road that will extend to the rear of the property or be an alternate <br />road to the rear of the property., as per your previous requirements. I <br />write this because I believe that the land under the proposed P~rx subdi- <br />vision cannot be land-locked so that the proposed buyer has no approaches <br />to it. I trust that you will accept the proposed site plan as far as the <br />conditions are concerned, and especially the access road. <br /> <br />Sincerely yours, <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />ROYAL ESQUIRE REALTY, INC. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.