Laserfiche WebLink
The regt~lar meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called <br />back to order at 7:55 P.M. <br /> <br />B. NOTE BOARD AND COUNCIL <br /> <br />No action by Commission <br /> <br />D-2 PLANNING CO~4ISSION BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case #1 - Robert IVojciks request to subdivided by metes and bounds: <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />C]mir]nan Peterson read the Findings of Fact out loud. <br /> <br />Mr. 15rojcik have purchased property from Mr. Johnson and I am requesting <br />a variance to build a 40' x 60' building. <br /> <br />Co~]~issi. oner D~mn - Any approval or disapproval will have to be with more <br />F.i. ndings of Fact. <br /> <br />Co~runissioner Deemer - Requests that Item #6 be added to Findings of <br />Fact stating that original parcel has already been subdivided by metes <br />and bounds. <br /> <br />~airnmn Peterson - City Ordinance does not allow for subdivision by <br />metes and bounds any longer. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dunn - It hasn't been a hard and fast rule in the past, but <br />I am opposed to metes and bounds rather than platting. <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson - Suggests Mr. Wojcik attempt platting with Mr. Shenk. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Wojcik - It is difficult to talk to Mr. Shank or his lawyer. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Deemer, seconded by Commissioner ZSmmerman, to <br />accept the Findings of Fact regardingMr. Woj:cik's request to subdivide <br />by metes and bound with the addition of Item #6 (Original parcel has <br />already been subdividedby.metes and bounds). Further Discussion: <br />Commissioner Schneider - request to subdivided by metes and bounds on <br />original parcel of property was approved by Council as a case of hardship. <br />Mr. Wojcik can go the same way if he wishes. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Comntissioners Dunn, <br />Zimmerman, Deemer, Ellis and Schneider. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Motion by Conmissioner Deemer, seconded by Commissioner Ellis, to recommend <br />to City Council rejection of this variance to subdivide by metes and <br />bounds based on the Findings of Fact. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Dunn, <br />Zimmerman, Deemer, Ellis and Schneider. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #2 - Mr. Reinhold Peltzer; request to subdivide by metes and bounds: <br />Chairman Peterson read the Findings of Fact out loud. <br /> <br />P fi Z/October 6, 1981 <br /> Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />