Laserfiche WebLink
during preparation of plans and specifications to see if upgrades are needed to any or all of the ramps. <br />No public utility improvements are anticipated with this project, other than gate valve and structure casting <br />adjustments. <br />Funding <br />The City's Special Assessments Policy allows 25% of pavement overlay project costs to be specially assessed <br />against benefiting properties. In addition, the City Charter and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 allow special <br />assessments to be levied against benefiting properties when a Feasibility Report is prepared and accepted by the <br />City Council in conjunction with the required Public Hearing process. The purpose of the Feasibility Report is to <br />advise the Council in a preliminary manner as to whether the proposed improvements are necessary, cost-effective, <br />and feasible, and as to whether the overlay improvements should be made as proposed or in connection with other <br />improvements. The report also includes estimated costs for the recommended improvements, as well as a <br />preliminary funding program and project schedule. Staff therefore requests that Council adopt Resolution <br />#16-03-058 accepting the attached Feasibility Report and ordering a Public Hearing for Improvement Project <br />#16-00, Division B, at the next regular meeting of the City Council scheduled for 7 pm on April 12th, 2016. <br />Alternatives: <br />Alternative Action #1 — Motion to adopt Resolution #16-03-058 accepting the Feasibility Report and ordering a <br />Public Hearing for Improvement Project #16-00, Division B; 2016 Mill and Overlay Improvements. <br />Alternative Action #2 — Motion to deny adoption of Resolution #16-03-058 at this time. <br />Funding Source: <br />The attached Feasibility Report was prepared in-house as part of staff's regular duties. <br />The engineer's opinion of probable costs for this project is $301,000. Estimated costs include 5% contingency costs <br />plus 14% indirect costs for administrative, engineering, finance and legal costs. The proposed improvements are <br />identified in the City's current 5 -year Capital Improvement Program, and can be funded using a combination of <br />General Obligation Street Reconstruction and Overlay Plan bond funds, special assessments to benefiting <br />properties, and utility enterprise funds. <br />In accordance with the City's Special Assessments Policy, chapter 8 of the City Charter, State Statute Chapter 429, <br />and applicable City codes, assessments are proposed to be levied against 3 properties that have direct access to the <br />improved street segment. Each property is proposed to be assessed based on the "per lot" method as each property <br />will receive approximately the same benefit due to the proposed improvements. Preliminary assessments for this <br />project are proposed in the amount of $950 per lot, resulting in a total assessment amount of $2,850. This is less <br />than 1% of the total eligible project costs. This amount is consistent with representative assessments previously <br />levied against benefiting properties receiving similar overlay improvements. Final assessments will be adopted by <br />the City Council after final project costs are known and an assessment hearing is held on October 11th, 2016. At <br />that time, the City Council may choose to reduce the amount of the assessments if final project costs are less than <br />estimated costs. Appendix C of the attached report includes a preliminary assessment roll and map. <br />The City's contribution to the project is proposed to include all funding in excess of the amount collected through <br />special assessments to benefiting properties, which totals $298,150. The City's contribution will be funded using <br />the 5 -year General Obligation Street Reconstruction and Overlay Bond funds, and utility enterprise funds can be <br />used if any utilities infrastructure improvements are required, though none are proposed at this time other than <br />adjustment of castings in the pavement. <br />No funds were budgeted for this project in 2016, but this improvement project is included in the City's current <br />5 -year Capital Improvement Plan. <br />Recommendation: <br />