My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/08/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 09/08/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:39:52 PM
Creation date
5/24/2004 9:43:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/08/1981
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE <br />CASE <br /> <br />TRAFFIC CONTROL AT 180TH AVENUE AND IODINE STREET NW: <br /> <br />This case was before Council on July 28, 1981 (Please refer <br />to D-3 case 2 Council New Business, Council agenda dated <br />July 28, 1981) and at that time you tabled it until the <br />Public Works Superintendent had an opportunity to take a . . <br />traffic count on it and could report back to you. <br /> <br />Accordingly, enclosure (D2-h) contains the Public Works Super- <br />intendent's recommendation. I have also reviewed the area with <br />the Public Works Superintendent and don't really see a need for <br />signing this street, however, if trucks start using this route <br />as a short-cut, this could create a problem. <br /> <br />Council Action: Your action will be to approve/disapprove of <br />the request. The following motion is submitted for your con- <br />sideration on this case: /~ <br /> Motion by Cour~cil~e~ber~.. and~seconded by <br /> CouncJ_lmember~j~t~a~/disapprove of installing a <br /> 30 m.p.h, sp~ed limit/sign on Iodine Street and a "No Thru <br /> Traffic" sign on Iodine just off of T.H. 47. (If you dis- <br /> approve, the motion should state that the traffic count taken <br /> didn't warrant signing of any type ~t~his time ) <br /> <br /> Motion carried. Voting yes, . <br /> <br />FLINTWOOD HILLS SECOND ADDITION DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT REQUEST FOR <br /> <br />APPROVAL: <br /> <br />Enclosure .(D2-i) contains the Flintwood Hills Second Addition's <br />development contract for Council approval. Council did give final <br />plat approval depending on certain things being accomplished and <br />one being a development contract. <br /> <br />Council shouid review this development contract very carefully, as <br />we are breaking new ground with this contract. It is a change from <br />what we have previously been doing in the City of Ramsey. <br /> <br />Council'Action:' Your action will be to approve/disapprove of the <br />contents contained in the above enclosure. The following motion is <br />submitted for your consideration in acting on this case: <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember ..... and seconded by Council- <br />member ....... to approve/disapprove/amend the proposed <br />development contract for'Flintwood Hills Second Addition. <br />(If Council disapproves, they.will have to insert the appropriate <br />language for this motion.)'Further to authorize the Mayor and <br />City Administrator/Clerk to sign the development contract for <br />the City of Ramsey. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes <br />Voting no . <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.