Laserfiche WebLink
8. That there is no Building Permit in the property file for the deck on the Subject Property; <br />however, based on assessment information in the property file, there is record of a deck on <br />the Subject Property dating back to at least 1981. <br />9. That Marianne and Stephen Nash (the "Property Owner") originally acquired both the <br />Subject Property and Lot 26, Bowers Mississippi Acres (hereinafter referred to as "Lot 26") <br />in 1989. <br />10. That Lot 26 was recently foreclosed on and subsequently, it was discovered that portions of <br />both the home and deck on the Subject Property partially encroach onto Lot 26. <br />11. That to resolve these encroachments, the current owner of Lot 26 is proposing an <br />Administrative Subdivision to realign the common boundary between the Subject Property <br />and Lot 26 to eliminate the structural encroachments. <br />12. That to minimize the expansion of the non -conforming lot size of Lot 26, the proposed <br />realigned lot line will be approximately seven (7) feet from the nearest part of the deck. <br />13. That Section 117-148 (Critical River Overlay District Development Standards) requires a <br />minimum setback of ten (10) feet. <br />14. That there is also an asphalt driveway `turn -around' affiliated with the Subject Property that <br />encroaches onto Lot 26 that will need to be removed such that the driveway meets the <br />minimum required setback of five (5) feet from the common lot line between the Subject <br />Property and Lot 26. <br />15. That economic circumstances alone do/do not create the practical difficulties. <br />16. That the plight is/is not due to circumstances unique to the Subject Property. <br />17. That the plight was/was not created by the Applicant. <br />18. That, if granted, the variance will/will not alter the locality' s essential character. <br />19. That, if granted, the variance will/will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to <br />adj acent property. <br />20. That, if granted, the variance will/will not have the effect of allowing a use that is prohibited <br />in the applicable zoning district. <br />21. That, if granted, the variance will/will not unreasonably increase the congestion on the public <br />street. <br />22. That, if granted, the variance will/will not adversely impact the degree of public health, safety <br />and general welfare provided for in the Ramsey City Code. <br />RESOLUTION #16-01-007 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />