My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/20/2015 - Joint with EPB
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/20/2015 - Joint with EPB
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:22:51 AM
Creation date
4/4/2016 11:45:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Joint with EPB
Document Date
04/20/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />Minn. Stat. § 326B.121. <br />Minn. Stat. § 326B.121. <br />Minn. Stat. § 326B.121. <br />Minn. Stat. § 326B.16. <br />Minn. Stat. § 326B.112. <br />Minn. Stat. § 326B.175. <br />Minn. Stat. § 412.221, subd. <br />23. <br />Minn. Stat. § 561.01. <br />See LMC information memo, <br />Public Nuisances. <br />Wessman v. Mankato, No. <br />A08-0273 (Minn. Ct. App. <br />2008)(unpublished decision). <br />If, as of Jan. 1, 2008, a municipality has in effect an ordinance adopting the <br />State Building Code, the municipality must continue to administer and <br />enforce the State Building Code within its jurisdiction. The municipality is <br />prohibited by state statute from repealing its ordinance adopting the State <br />Building Code. However, this provision does not apply to cities that have a <br />population of less than 2,500, according to the last federal census, and that <br />are located outside of a metropolitan county. These cities may repeal an <br />ordinance adopting the State Building Code and they are not required to <br />administer and enforce the code (although the State Building Code will <br />remain in effect). These cities may, however, opt to enforce and administer <br />the State Building Code by adopting a local ordinance. <br />A city must not, by ordinance or through a development agreement, require <br />building code provisions regulating components or systems of any structure <br />that are different from any provision of the State Building Code. However, a <br />city may, with the approval of the state building official, adopt an ordinance <br />that is more restrictive than the State Building Code where geological <br />conditions warrant a more restrictive ordinance. <br />Requirements regarding accessibility, elevator safety, and bleacher safety <br />apply statewide, with no exception. <br />2. Nuisance ordinances <br />With or without zoning, cities may prevent and abate nuisances through the <br />passage of a local ordinance that defines nuisances and provides for their <br />regulation, prevention and/or abatement. Generally a "nuisance" is anything <br />that is injurious to health, indecent or offensive to the senses, or an <br />obstruction to the free use of property so as to interfere with the comfortable <br />enjoyment of life or property. <br />3. Property maintenance ordinances <br />Cities may choose to deal with the specific nuisance posed by dilapidated <br />buildings through the adoption of a property maintenance ordinance. Such <br />ordinances typically establish standards for exterior maintenance related to <br />painting, siding, roofing and broken windows. City property maintenance <br />ordinances should be drafted and enforced in a manner that is consistent <br />with the State Building Code. Property maintenance ordinances should <br />generally not attempt to regulate construction issues already regulated by the <br />State Building Code, because such regulation may be pre-empted. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/20/2015 <br />Zoning Guide for Cities Page 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.