My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/20/2015 - Joint with EPB
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/20/2015 - Joint with EPB
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:22:51 AM
Creation date
4/4/2016 11:45:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Joint with EPB
Document Date
04/20/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.355, subd. <br />3. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.356, subd. <br />2. Lerner v. City of <br />Minneapolis, 284 Minn. 46, <br />169 N.W.2d 380 (Minn. <br />1969). A.G. Op. 63-b-24 <br />(Dec. 9, 1971). A.G. Op. 161- <br />b, (Aug. 8, 1966). <br />See LMC information memo <br />Purchase and Sale of Real <br />Property. <br />Lerner v. City of <br />Minneapolis, 284 Minn. 46, <br />169 N.W.2d 380 (Minn. <br />1969). A.G. Op. 161-b (Aug. <br />8, 1966). <br />Unless otherwise provided by charter, all amendments to the comprehensive <br />plan must be approved by a two-thirds vote of all of its members. <br />E. Role in purchase and sale of real property <br />After a comprehensive municipal plan or section of a plan has been <br />recommended by the planning commission and a copy filed with the city <br />council, the planning commission must be given a chance to review and <br />comment on all proposed public acquisitions or disposal of real property <br />within the city. This includes acquisitions or disposal by the city, but also: <br />• Any special district or agency in the city. <br />• Any other political subdivision (public schools or the county for <br />example) having jurisdiction within the city. <br />This provision would appear to apply even when the comprehensive plan <br />has not yet been adopted by council, so long as the planning commission has <br />filed its recommended plan with the city. <br />After review, the planning commission must report in writing its findings to <br />compliance of the proposed acquisition or to disposal of real estate with the <br />comprehensive municipal plan. <br />The purpose of this requirement is to allow review of overall municipal <br />development by the city planning commission, the authority charged with <br />developing and reviewing the comprehensive land use plan for the <br />municipality. <br />The planning commission has 45 days to report on the proposal, unless the <br />city council designates a shorter or longer period for review. If the planning <br />commission does not report within the required timeline, this statutory <br />provision is considered waived by the commission. <br />In addition, a city council may by resolution adopted by two-thirds vote <br />dispense with this requirement when in its judgment it finds that the <br />proposed acquisition or disposal of real property has no relationship to the <br />comprehensive municipal plan. <br />In submitting comments and review, the planning commission serves in a <br />strictly advisory role. The city council ultimately decides on the purchase or <br />disposal of real estate and is not bound by planning commission <br />recommendations. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/20/2015 <br />Planning Commission Guide Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.