Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/20/2015 - Joint with EPB

Home

RELEVANT LINKS: Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6 (1). Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6 (2). Minn. Stat. § 462.359, subd. 4. Minn. Stat. § 462.354, subd. 2. Minn. Stat. § 462.354, subd. 2. Minn. Stat. § 462.354, subd. 2. Minn. Stat. § 462.354, subd. 2. See information memos, Zoning Guide for Cities and Land Use Variances. • To hear and decide appeals where it is alleged that there is an error in any order, requirement, decision or determination made by an administrative officer in the enforcement of the zoning ordinance. • To hear requests for variances from a city zoning ordinance. • To hear and decide appeals when a land use, zoning permit or approval for a building is denied based upon the city's official map. • Such other duties as the city council may direct. In any city where the council does not serve as the BZA, the city council may, except as otherwise provided by charter, provide by ordinance that the decisions of the BZA on matters within its jurisdiction are: • Final subject only to judicial review; or • Final subject to appeal to the council and the right of later judicial review; or • Advisory to the council. The ordinance creating the BZA should specify at minimum: • The time and manner by which hearings by the BZA shall be held, including provisions related to notice to interested parties. • Rules for the conduct of proceedings before the BZA, including provisions for the giving of oaths to witnesses and the filing of written briefs by the parties. In cities where the planning commission does not act as the BZA, the BZA may not make a decision on an appeal or petition until the planning commission, or a representative authorized by it, has had reasonable opportunity, not to exceed 60 days, to review and report to the BZA about the appeal or petition. It is important to note that while state statute provides the planning commission 60 days to respond to appeals or petitions, the 60 -Day Rule (an entirely different rule with 60 days in the title) may still apply to some matters brought before the BZA (for example, requests for variances) by application or petition of property owners. As a result, internal procedures should be developed to coordinate planning commission review that does not violate the 60 -Day Rule automatic approval statute. Planning commissions charged with reviewing applications for variances must follow fairly strict legal standards for their review. Specifically, the city must follow the requirements of the state statute related to whether enforcement of a zoning ordinance provision as applied to a particular piece of property would cause the landowner "practical difficulties." The standards for review in granting variances are discussed in depth in the LMC Information Memo Zoning Guide for Cities. League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/20/2015 Planning Commission Guide Page 17