Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />See Handbook, Chapter 27. <br />Minn. Stat. § 15.17, subds. 1, <br />2. <br />See LMC information memo, <br />Meetings of City Councils for <br />more information on minutes. <br />See LMC information memo, <br />Zoning Guide, Section V -C-2 <br />LMC information memo <br />Taking the Mystery out of <br />Findings of Fact. <br />See Sample: Findings of Fact, <br />City of Burnsville. <br />LMC information memos: <br />Taking the Mystery out of <br />Findings of Fact; Zoning <br />Decisions. <br />1. Minutes and records <br />State law requires all officers and agencies of the state, including planning <br />commissions in statutory and home -rule charter cities, to make and preserve <br />all records necessary for a full and accurate knowledge of their official <br />activities. These records include books, papers, letters, contracts, documents, <br />maps, plans and other items. State statutes do not explicitly require planning <br />commissions to take minutes of their meetings, but such minutes may be <br />necessary to make a full and accurate record of the commission's <br />proceedings. <br />Minutes are further recommended because the actions of planning <br />commissions and land use decisions, in general, are frequently subject to <br />court review. When a city land use decision is reviewed by a court of law, <br />the court requires cities to document the basis for their land use decisions in <br />written, contemporaneous findings of fact. <br />Planning commission bylaws or city policy should set the requirements for <br />meeting minute approval and content. For example, a policy may require the <br />minutes to reflect all motions and resolutions and votes taken by the <br />commission. Planning commission policy also may assign responsibility for <br />minute taking to the commission secretary or to a city staff member. <br />2. Findings of fact <br />In addition to minutes, whenever the planning commission makes an official <br />recommendation related to a matter referred to it by council or on a land use <br />application submitted to the city (for example, a conditional use permit, <br />zoning amendment, variance or subdivision application), it should make <br />written findings of fact related to the recommendation. <br />Findings of fact from the planning commission serve three important roles: <br />• They articulate to the city council the planning commission's <br />recommendations on issues before the commission, including its basis <br />for making its recommendations. <br />• They communicate to a land use applicant the commission's approval of <br />a project or identify for the applicant disapproval and the reasons for <br />such disapproval. <br />• They support the city's ultimate decision on the issue should the city's <br />decision be challenged in court. <br />In land use cases, Minnesota courts are looking for a sufficient statement of <br />the reasons given by the city to grant or deny an application request. The <br />role of the court is to examine the city's reasons and ascertain whether the <br />record before the city council supports them. The reasons given by the city <br />must be legally sufficient and have a factual basis. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/20/2015 <br />Planning Commission Guide Page 23 <br />