Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />City of North Oaks v. Sarpal, <br />797 N.W.2d 18 (Minn. 2011). <br />Mohler v. City of St. Louis <br />Park, 643 N.W.2d 623 <br />(Minn. Ct. App. 2002). <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. <br />6. <br />Kismet Investors v. County of <br />Benton, 617 N.W.2d 85 <br />(Minn. 2000). <br />Kismet Investors v. County of <br />Benton, 617 N.W.2d 85 <br />(Minn. 2000). <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. <br />6(2). <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.357. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.358, subd. <br />2a. <br />Minn. Stat. § 15.99. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. <br />4. <br />See Part V-A, The 60 -day <br />rule. <br />Error by city staff in approving plans does not entitle a person to a variance. <br />While the result might be harsh, a municipality cannot be estopped from <br />correctly enforcing a zoning ordinance even if the property owner relies to <br />his or her detriment on prior city action. <br />As discussed above, the most common requests for variances relate to <br />physical conditions on the property. For example, setbacks and height <br />restrictions. On occasion a city may receive requests for variances related to <br />uses. For example, a request to use the property for a landscaping business <br />out of a home in a residential district. This is commonly known as a use <br />variance. <br />A use variance may not be granted if the use is prohibited in a zoning <br />district. This may occur when the local zoning ordinance specifically lists <br />prohibited uses (such as industrial uses in a residential zone) or when a <br />zoning ordinance lists permitted uses and states that all uses not specifically <br />listed are considered prohibited. <br />A city may grant a use variance when a use is not prohibited in the zoning <br />district. For example, the zoning ordinance is silent on the issue or when the <br />use is explicitly allowed, but limited by another portion of the city <br />ordinance. For example, when a permitted use cannot meet performance <br />standards elsewhere in the ordinance (such as parking or screening). The <br />requirements of unusual hardship and other statutory requirements still apply <br />to use variances. <br />Finally, state statute creates two use variances that a city may always choose <br />(but is not required) to permit through a variance. State statute specifically <br />empowers cities to grant use variances for solar energy systems where a <br />variance is needed to overcome inadequate access to direct sunlight and for <br />the temporary use of a single family residence as a two-family residence. <br />e. Requests for rezoning or zoning ordinance <br />amendments <br />Cities have the authority to rezone (change a designation from residential to <br />mixed commercial) or otherwise amend the zoning regulations governing a <br />particular parcel of property (such as adding a permitted or conditional use). <br />Note however, that rezoning is an amendment to the actual zoning ordinance <br />and therefore all the procedures for amendments to the zoning ordinance <br />apply. <br />Rezoning may be initiated by the planning commission, council, or a <br />petition by an individual landowner. If a request for rezoning does not come <br />from the planning commission, the matter must be referred to the planning <br />commission for study and report. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/20/2015 <br />Zoning Guide for Cities Page 33 <br />