Agenda - Planning Commission - 01/07/2016

Home

Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: RESOLUTION #16-01-006 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF A VARIANCE TO LOT SIZE AND LOT WIDTH TO ALLOW FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE SUBDIVISION TO ELIMINATE EXISTING ENCROACHMENTS OF PORTIONS OF A DECK AND HOME. WHEREAS, Central Bank (Permittee) has properly applied for a variance to Section 117- 148 (Critical River Overlay District Development Standards) of the Ramsey City Code with regard to lot size and lot width to allow for an Administrative Subdivision that will eliminate an existing encroachment of portions of both a deck and home on the property generally known as 14510 Bowers Drive NW and legally described as follows: Lot 26, Bowers Mississippi Acres, Anoka County, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). AND WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on January 7, 2016, pursuant to Section 117-53 of the Ramsey City Code, and adopted findings of fact relating to the request for a variance. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That based on Findings of Fact #0958, a variance to lot size and lot width to facilitate an Administrative Subdivision that will eliminate an encroachment of portions of both a deck and home on the Subject Property, as shown on the attached exhibit, is hereby granted. 2. That the Permittee shall be responsible for all costs incurred in administering and enforcing this variance. 3. That this Variance shall automatically expire if the use is not initiated by January 7, 2017, and completing the Administrative Subdivision transferring a portion of the Subject Property to the adjacent parcel, generally known as 14500 Bowers Dr. NW, including providing evidence to the City that the Property Identification Numbers (PINs) have been combined after recording of the Quit Claim Deed, shall constitute initiation. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: and the following abstained: and the following were absent: