My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/03/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/03/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:25:03 AM
Creation date
4/5/2016 8:16:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
03/03/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular Planning Commission 5. 1. <br />Meeting Date: 03/03/2016 <br />By: Michael Healy, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />PUBLIC HEARING: Consider Ordinance # 16-05 Amending City Code 117-615 to Correct the Approved Formats <br />for Warranties on Stage I and Stage II Improvements <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this hearing is to consider an ordinance to amend City Code 117-615 to align City Code language <br />with the City's current policy regarding warranties for Stage 1 and Stage II improvements on private developments. <br />When private developments construct Stage 1 improvements (public improvements such as sidewalks, roads, storm <br />drainage, etc.) and Stage 2 improvements (seal coating, street striping, streetlights, etc.), the developer must <br />warranty their work for one (1) year following the final acceptance of any required improvements. If the <br />improvements are defective or fail within that year, the City can draw from the warranty funds to make repairs. The <br />City has a longstanding informal policy of requiring developers to warranty their work by giving the City cash or a <br />letter of credit equal to 25% of the cost of the improvements. The money is refunded at the end of the one-year <br />warranty period. Currently, however, the code suggests that developers also have the option of submitting a bond <br />for warranty and maintenance. The City historically has not accepted bonds in these situations because of the <br />logistical difficulties involved in trying to collect on a bond to pay for repairs. The proposed amendment would <br />remove the language that states that bonds are acceptable for warranties and replace it with new language <br />formalizing the City's policy of requiring 25% of the project costs as a warranty in the form of either cash or a letter <br />of credit. Leaving the language in its current form could create confusion among developers who might reasonably <br />expect the City to honor the current language that bonds are an acceptable format for warranties. <br />Notification: <br />A notification regarding the Public Hearing was published in the Anoka County UnionHerald. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />City Code 117-615 currently states that the City requires that a subdivider submit a warranty/maintenance bond for <br />Stage 1 and Stage 2 Improvements. The City does not accept bonds for warranties for logistical reasons and has a <br />longstanding informal policy of requiring subdividers to submit a cash escrow or a letter of credit equal to 25% of <br />the cost of the improvements. The proposed ordinance would amend City Code to bring the code's language into <br />alignment with actual City practices. The following revision is being proposed to 117-615 with strike -outs <br />indicating text that is being removed and underlining indicating text that is being added: <br />(1) Warranty. The city shall, where appropriate, require a subdivider submission of a warranty/maintenance bond <br />financial guarantee in the form of a cash escrow or letter of creditin the amount equal to that established by the <br />development agreement 25% of the cost of the Stage I and Stage II improvements as required by this Article which <br />shall be in force for one year following the final acceptance of any required improvements and shall guarantee <br />satisfactory performance of said improvements. <br />Alternatives <br />Alternative 1- Recommend that City Council adopt the proposed ordinance as written. <br />Alternative 2- Recommend that City Council adopt the proposed ordinance but with modifications. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.