08/12/87 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Also considered, was whether there were any existing "natural" demand management mechanisms. A preliminary assessment of annual turnover of hangar property ownership in the recent past at Crystal Airport indicates total annual hangar turnover is very low and turnover of storage spots between airports also, very limited. Another similar aspect is the practice of "doubling-up" in existing hangars if new hangar areas are not available. Recent indications are this pent-up demand at Crystal and Flying Cloud Airports are now showing up as new hangar units in the just completed or to be completed building areas at Airlake and Anoka Co.-Blaine Airports. Thus, a certain number of new building area slots, assumed to be available for projected aircraft demand, are being taken by existing based aircraft. A third option was to assess the potential of other existing airports within or near Search Area (A). It was established that the privately-owned, public-use Maple Airstrip, while moderately accessable from the Flying Cloud and Crystal Airport service areas, was situated too close to the community of Maple Plaine, constraining future development potential. The Buffalo Municipal Airport in Wright Co. was likewise assessed. It is 40-50 miles from~nuch of the Flying Cloud and Crystal Service Areas and while it has a paved runway, its length of 2,500', together with other site limitations reduces its attractiveness to metro users for basing their aircraft. A fourth option was to assess other potential "new" capacity, two airports, Gateway (located in the city of Ramsey), and a proposed new Carver Co. Airport were considered. The Gateway facility is an existing privately-owned, public- use airport. The city is in the process of attempting to make this a municipal facility. After an unsuccessful attempt to locate a new airport site in Ramsey, the city has settled on expansion'at the existing industrial park location. The two existing runways are to be replaced by a single paved runwa 3,300' long. While this is an existing site, it faces a number of hurdles before becoming a municipal facility: It must successfully complete an environmental assessment (this includes the taking of 13 residences); It must successfully resolve local land use development and airport area zoning issues; The city must provide local matching funds if they successfully obtain federal and state aid; Finally, there is the conflict with expansion of the Anoka Landfill which may possibly leave the Metro Council in a position of having to decide on future development of one or the other facility. The other airport considered is a proposed new minor airport in Carver Co. for which a feasibility study is currently in process. The county has not yet determined that locating, financing & developing a new airport is .feasible or desirable. Both the Gateway and Carver Co. proposals represent a potential~ addition to capacity in the west sub-region. Although these facilities, if they materialize, would not provide substantdal relief to Flying Cloud and Crystal Airports, they would enhance the capability of the system. ~ The demand/capacity relationships of including these last two options (Gateway and possibly Carver Co.) are shown in Table 6: CONCLUSIONS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION o The do-nothing alternative is unacceptable since available capacity is grossly inadequate to handle projected demand.