My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/10/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2016
>
Agenda - Council - 05/10/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:49:31 PM
Creation date
5/10/2016 11:30:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/10/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
548
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
buildable area on certain parcels once wetland and floodplain areas are factored out. This concern typically arises <br />as part of the review of a Building Permit application for decks (or other typical homeowner additions) in which <br />wetlands, storm water ponds, or other infrastructure reduces the net (remaining) buildable area. The outcome <br />typically involves consideration of an Encroachment Agreement, which requires approval of the City Council, and <br />potentially requires review/approval by the LRRWMO of a No Loss Exemption (wetland encroachment). Both <br />actions consume City resources and have a cost to the property owner, both financially and in terms of time. <br />Developing a lot depth standard would help reduce and/or eliminate these issues for the future homeowner(s). As <br />drafted, any newly created residential lot would need to have a depth of at least 100 feet for a contiguous width of <br />sixty (60) feet that is exclusive of any wetland, wetland setback area, floodway, easement or steep slopes (defined in <br />City Code as lands having an average slopes over twelve percent [ 12%] as measured over horizontal distances of <br />fifty 1501 feet or more, and are not bluffs). <br />Essentially, this establishes a minimum buildable area that should provide reasonably sufficient space for common <br />homeowner improvements such as a deck and/or a detached accessory building. The underlying zoning district <br />would still establish the minimum lot width and area requirements. Staff acknowledges that this standard likely <br />would impact the number of potential lots within a proposed subdivision; however, this should result in more <br />'usable' space for the future homeowner to install common features such as a deck, detached accessory building <br />and/or landscaping projects. <br />The Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing on this topic at the April7, 2016 meeting and there were no <br />written or verbal comments received. <br />The Ordinance was introduced by City Council on April26, 2016 and is now eligible for adoption. <br />Alternatives <br />Alternative # 1: Adopt Ordinance # 16-03 establishing a wetland/storm water pond setback of sixteen and a half feet <br />(16.5') and establishing a lot depth standard of 100 feet for a continuous width of sixty (60) feet for all newly <br />created residential lots. The Ordinance will bring the City into compliance with the LRRWMO's 3rd Generation <br />Plan by establishing a wetland setback. Additionally, establishing a minimum lot depth should help reduce and/or <br />eliminate the need (or at least requests for) for Encroachment Agreements and review by the LRRWMO. Staff <br />supports this alternative. <br />Alternative #2: Adopt an amended version of Ordinance #16-03 that establishes a wetland/storm water pond <br />setback of sixteen and a half feet (16.5) but either modifies or eliminates the lot depth standard. <br />Alternative #3: Do not adopt Ordinance #16-03. This would result in the City being in violation of the LRRWMO's <br />3rd Generation Plan, which could have an impact on future development projects. Furthermore, it leaves the <br />potential for lots to be created with very little 'usable' or 'buildable' area after a home is constructed, which <br />ultimately can lead to frustration on the future homeowner's end and takes additional resources from the City to <br />resolve the issue/concern. Staff does not support this alternative. <br />Funding Source: <br />This case is being handled as part of Staffs regular duties. <br />Recommendation: <br />The Environmental Policy Board also reviewed the draft Ordinance at it's February 22, 2016 meeting. Both the <br />Planning Commission and Environmental Policy Board recommend that the City Council adopt Ordinance # 16-03. <br />Action: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.