My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/10/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2016
>
Agenda - Council - 05/10/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:49:31 PM
Creation date
5/10/2016 11:30:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/10/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
548
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Development Director Gladhill reported the DNR set the minimum standards and <br />noted the City was responsible for administering the critical area overlay district. He believed <br />the proposed development met the rules and intent of the critical area overlay district due to the <br />proposed development pattern. <br />Commissioner Brauer indicated the lots on the other side of Bowers Drive were similar in size <br />and scale to the proposed lots. For this reason, he supported the new development. <br />Commissioner Bauer asked if the City sent out notices to adjacent homeowners regarding the <br />proposed development. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill commented the City sent out notices via U.S. Mail <br />regarding the public hearing that would be held on Thursday, March 10th at 5:30 p.m. to all <br />property owners on Bowers Drive. <br />Chairperson Levine stated the consensus of the Planning Commission was for this development <br />to move forward. <br />5.03: Consider Ordinance #16-04 to Amend City Code Section 2-159 (Duties, <br />Responsibilities, and Objectives) to Incorporate the Principals of the Environmental <br />Policy Board's Statement of Purpose <br />Presentation <br />City Planner Anderson presented the staff report stating the Environmental Policy Board (EPB) <br />developed a Statement of Purpose last year and through that process, the City Council and EPB <br />collaboratively developed various purposes and strategies appropriate for the board. This <br />included involvement in the Comprehensive Plan update process and an active role in review of <br />certain Land Use Applications. The Statement of Purpose also noted that the Board's <br />involvement in reviewing Land Use Applications would be revisited in a year to determine <br />whether this had been effective and added value to the review process. The EPB reviewed their <br />involvement with the review of Land Use Applications at their January meeting and concluded <br />that it did add value to the review process and noted that it had not resulted in the delay of any <br />application or project. The purpose of this case is to consider Ordinance #16-04 that would <br />codify the principals of the EPB's Statement of Purpose in City Code. Staff recommended <br />adoption of Ordinance #16-04 <br />Commission Business <br />Commissioner VanScoy saw the value of the EPB reviewing land use applications with variances <br />within overlay districts. However, he did not see the rationale in this same group reviewing plats <br />and believed this was over monitoring by the government. <br />Planning Commission/March 3, 2016 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.