My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 04/18/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2016
>
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 04/18/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 11:55:37 AM
Creation date
5/11/2016 8:18:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
04/18/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br />Bioengineering approaches combine engineering techniques with ecological principles to stabilize the <br />bank. They rely heavily on deep-rooted native plants along with a variety of other natural materials to <br />reinforce and stabilize eroding riverbanks. Bioengineering also incorporates the goals of fish and wildlife <br />habitat restoration, maintenance of water quality, and aesthetic considerations. In addition to bank <br />stabilization, many benefits are achieved through bioengineering: <br />• Improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat, <br />• Increased connectivity among habitats along the riverbank, <br />• Decreased water temperatures through shading, and <br />• Improved soil and water quality. <br />The stabilization solution for an eroding riverbank could certainly use a combination of hard armoring <br />and bioengineering. In fact, ACD often recommends this combination on large river systems such as the <br />Mississippi River because of the benefits provided by both approaches. <br />Possible Stabilization Approaches <br />Stabilization of riverbanks can be achieved through many different approaches. Below is a list of some <br />common stabilization approaches (both bioengineering and hard armoring) to correct erosion issues. <br />Again, a combination of approaches is often specified as the most effective solution. <br />• Restoration of Native Vegetation — Deep-rooted, native <br />vegetation creates a buffer along the riverbank that can <br />provide stabilization and minimize erosion. Furthermore, if <br />the bank is damaged, the vegetation has the ability to self - <br />heal with additional growth. <br />• Cedar Tree Revetment — Anchoring Eastern Red Cedar trees <br />to the toe of the slope reduces water velocities near the <br />bank to protect against erosion. Furthermore, the reduced <br />water velocities promote sedimentation and can actually <br />help rebuild the bank. This provides a cost-effective <br />bioengineering option for moderate to severely eroding <br />riverbanks. <br />• Live Staking — Dormant, live stakes of native species (e.g. <br />Sandbar Willow) can be installed to establish a dense plant <br />community with high stem density that will stabilize the <br />riverbank. <br />• Hard Armoring — Hard armoring of the bank may be <br />necessary along riverbanks on large systems that <br />experience the greatest erosive forces (e.g. outside bends). <br />However, it is often not necessary to hard armor the entire <br />bank from the toe of the slope to the top of the bank. <br />Rather, the hard armoring can extend to a predetermined <br />elevation (e.g. 2-year or 5-year flood elevation), above <br />which could be stabilized using the establishment of native <br />vegetation. Furthermore, the sections that are hard <br />armored can often be live staked to provide additional <br />stabilization value, wildlife habitat, and improved shoreline <br />aesthetics. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.