My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/07/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/07/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:25:18 AM
Creation date
5/11/2016 8:33:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/07/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
326
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning Bulletin March 25, 2016 I Volume 10 I Issue 6 <br />Citation: Meleyco Partnership No. 2 v. City of West St. Paul, 2016 <br />WL 281229 (Minn. Ct. App. 2016) <br />MINNESOTA (02/25/16) This case addressed the issue of <br />whether a tenant's cessation of retail activities triggered the discon- <br />tinuance of a property owner's use of a nonconfoiiiiing sign, such <br />that the nonconforming use was abandoned after one year pursuant to <br />the city's zoning ordinance. <br />The Background/Facts: Meleyco Partnership No. 2 ("Meleyco") <br />owned property in West St. Paul (the "City"). In 1971, Meleyco law- <br />fully erected a pylon sign on the property. More than two decades <br />later, the City enacted an ordinance that restricted the use of pylon <br />signs. Meleyco's pylon sign thereafter constituted a legal, noncon- <br />forming use that was grandfathered under the City's zoning ordinance <br />(the "Ordinance"). <br />City Ordinance § 4.2(1) provided that: "[a]ny Structure or Use <br />lawfully existing upon the Effective Date of this Ordinance may be <br />continued at the size and in the manner of operation existing upon <br />such date except as hereinafter specified." Specifically with regard to <br />signs, the City's Ordinance § 37.7(1) provided that: "A Sign that is <br />legally established upon the effective date of this Ordinance may be <br />continued at the size and in the manner of operation existing upon <br />such date except as specified in this Section." The Ordinance further <br />provided that: "Whenever the use of a Legally Established Noncon- <br />forming Sign is discontinued. . .any future use. . .shall be in <br />conformity." (City Ordinance § 37.7(1)(a)(v).) Under the City <br />Ordinance, discontinuance of a use of a'legally nonconforming sign <br />for more than one year was presumed to be abandonment of the <br />nonconforming sign use. <br />In 1997, Meleyco entered into a lease with Pawn America, which <br />gave Pawn America the right to use the property and the pylon sign <br />through April 30, 2014. In November 2012, Pawn America discontin- <br />ued its retail operations at the property, but it continued to use the <br />property for storage and other business -related purposes through the <br />end of its lease term, which again was April 30, 2014. With regard to <br />the pylon sign, in April 2013, Pawn America covered the pylon sign, <br />effectively making it blank. <br />In February 2014, the City's zoning administrator sent Meleyco a <br />notice stating that the sign was considered abandoned since the prop- <br />erty had been "vacant" since November 2012. <br />Meleyco appealed. <br />The City's committee of adjustments upheld the zoning administra- <br />tor's decision. The committee agreed that: (1) "The cessation of <br />operations by Pawn America constituted a discontinuation of the use <br />©2016 Thomson Reuters 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.