My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/07/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/07/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:25:18 AM
Creation date
5/11/2016 8:33:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/07/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
326
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
March 25, 2016 I Volume 10 1 Issue 6 Zoning Bulletin <br />NORTH DAKOTA <br />Dunn County appealed a district court ruling that found that the <br />North Dakota Industrial Commission had sole jurisdiction over an oil <br />waste treatment facility in the county. The judge had found that the <br />commission "controls drilling, all operations for oil and gas produc- <br />tion, and, since 2013, the disposal of saltwater and oilfield wastes." <br />On appeal, the county reportedly argued that "there needs to be a <br />more precise distinction between activities that can only be performed <br />at an oil and gas well or disposal well, as opposed to activities, such <br />as treatment, that can be performed elsewhere and fall within county <br />zoning." The county is asking the court to "uphold its authority to ap- <br />ply zoning to oil and gas development." <br />Source: The Bismarck Tribune; http://bismarclaribune.com <br />WISCONSIN <br />In mid -February, the state Senate approved a bill that would allow <br />towns to "exempt themselves from the county's zoning plan and en- <br />able a town's governing board to enact an ordinance allowing it to <br />withdraw from any county zoning rules and a county development <br />plan." "The exemption would apply to a town located in a county <br />with a population of at least 485,000 people. The bill would require <br />the town to pass its own ordinance and development plan in lieu of <br />the county's." Opponents of the bill argued that it would "fragment <br />decision -making and disrupt the balance of farmland and develop- <br />ment in the county." The Assembly had previously passed the bill, <br />and bill was headed to the Governor's desk to be signed into law. <br />Source: The Cap Times; hUp://hostmadison.com <br />12 © 2016 Thomson Reuters <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.