Laserfiche WebLink
buffers. White the minimum width needed <br />depends to some extent on what benefits <br />or ecosystem services are deemed impor- <br />tant by the community, virtually all sources <br />recognize that the wider the buffer the bet- <br />ter the ecosystem services performance. <br />• Inventory riparian areas as part of the sub- <br />division process and preserve unimpaired <br />riparian areas in natural conditions. <br />• Require restoration of impaired riparian <br />zones as a condition of subdivision ap- <br />proval. <br />LAYOUT AND DESIGN <br />Cluster subdivisions are one of the most well- <br />known techniques planners use to address <br />many of the needs for better preserving the <br />natural landscape and its functions. A cluster <br />subdivision allows for the modification of <br />dimensional requirements of the zoning law <br />to group or "cluster" structures or lots at a <br />higher density on the most suitable portion <br />of land, leaving other areas open to preserve <br />the natural and scenic quality of open lands. <br />A conservation subdivision is a type of cluster <br />subdivision that focuses on protecting large <br />portions ofa site with important environmen- <br />tal value. Usually, half or more of the site is <br />preserved as open space. From a flood risk <br />perspective, there is no other approach that <br />has as much ability to reduce flood damages <br />while simultaneously protecting the integrity of <br />the floodplain ecosystem. PAS Report No. 473 <br />recommends conservation subdivisions with <br />no lots in the floodplain as the best policy for <br />communities. Nothing has changed since 1997 <br />to alter that view. However, some communities <br />may have more difficulty implementing such <br />an approach due to their geography or the <br />fact that any remaining developable land is at <br />higher risk from flooding. <br />Here are the basic principles of conser- <br />vation subdivision design that also apply in <br />reducing flood risk and enhancing natural <br />floodplain functions: <br />• Ensure that floodplain areas are nonbuild- <br />able, either laid out as areas that are non - <br />buildable on lots, or set aside as reserve <br />areas entirety (not contained within lots).. <br />• Preserve riparian areas in perpetuity by <br />making them reserve areas protected <br />through permanent easements. This, in <br />turn, protects or enhances the conservation <br />of wildlife and aquatic resources. <br />• Use smaller lots. <br />• Allow for increasing density in developable <br />areas to ensure a roughly equivalent lot <br />yield that would otherwise be allowed if a <br />more conventional subdivision design was <br />applied to the site. <br />• Be flexible in reducing setbacks from roads <br />and increasing setbacks from floodplains or <br />water bodies. <br />Communities can accomplish this by <br />prohibiting creation of new lots in the flood - <br />plain and requiring that any flood -prone land <br />not be included in any lot. Theycan also <br />require that floodplain land be set aside as <br />designated open space on the subdivision <br />plat and preserved in perpetuity through <br />permanent easements. If floodplain develop- <br />ment is unavoidable, they can require that all <br />lots created have adequate buildable area on <br />natural high ground above the ioo-year base <br />flood elevation. They can also require a flood <br />protection elevation of at least two feet above <br />the ioo-year flood elevation for any buildings <br />or improvements on a lot, a standard used by <br />Portland, Oregon. Finally, they can ensure that <br />conservation subdivision submittals are meet- <br />ing the following three goals at a minimum: <br />• Protecting natural streams, water supplies, <br />and watershed areas <br />• Maintaining and enhancing the conserva- <br />tion of wildlife, natural, or scenic resources <br />• Promoting conservation of soils, wetlands, <br />and other significant natural features <br />Other considerations in layout and design <br />include restrictions on problematic uses (e.g., <br />storage or production of hazardous materials), <br />dedication of land areas for public facilities <br />and services, and providing adequate access, <br />particularly where evacuation may be neces- <br />sary or for the use of emergency vehicles. While <br />not addressed here, these issues do receive <br />attention in the forthcoming report. <br />INFRASTRUCTURE <br />In most subdivisions, roads and utilities are <br />the two areas of concern with regard to devel- <br />opment of infrastructure. The important ques- <br />tions relate to establishing standards that will <br />protect such infrastructure from damage from <br />natural hazards, including floods. For roads <br />and bridges, this primarily means sizing cul- <br />verts and bridges to handle the ioo-year storm, <br />and requiring the elevation of road surfaces <br />above the base flood elevation —or allowing <br />only a minimal flow of water over the road in <br />such an event. <br />Utilities typically include electric, natural <br />gas, and water and wastewater installations, <br />all of which must be protected from damage in <br />the event of flooding, for example, by mounting <br />transformers and similar facilities above flood <br />CI A nonelevated pad mounted transformer in the floodplain, very close to the <br />flooding source. <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 3.16 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION Ipage4 <br />