My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/07/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/07/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:25:18 AM
Creation date
5/11/2016 8:33:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/07/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
326
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular Planning Commission 5. 3. <br />Meeting Date: 04/07/2016 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />PUBLIC HEARING: Consider Resolutions 16-04-063 and 16-04-064 Related to a Request for a Variance to <br />Maximum Allowable Cul-De-Sac Length; Case of Lennar Homes (Project No. 16-51) <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The City has received an application from Lennar (the "Developer") for Final Plat review of Woodlands 2nd <br />Addition, a residential development generally located east of Variolite Street and south of 161st Ave (the "Subject <br />Property"). The Plat is the second phase of the Woodlands project and will create fifteen (15) new single family <br />residential lots. Through the review of the Final Plat, it was noted that the proposed extension of 159th Ave to the <br />east will, if only temporarily, result in a road segment that is longer than 600 feet. Upon full build out of the <br />Woodlands site, this Variance would not be necessary. <br />Notification: <br />Staff attempted to notify all Property Owners within a 350 foot radius of the Properties of the Public Hearing via <br />Standard US Mail. The Public Hearing was also published in the City's official newsletter, the Anoka County Union <br />Herald. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The second phase of the Woodlands project will extend 159th Ave to east about 1,300 feet and, based on the <br />phasing of the project, will terminate mid -block. The Developer will construct 159th Ave ninety (90) feet beyond <br />the intersection with Sapphire St and will also construct a small segment of Sapphire St north of 159th Ave another <br />ninety (90) feet. Neither segment will have a cul-de-sac bulb constructed initially. However, Public Works, <br />Engineering and Fire Staff have reviewed the proposed configuration and are supportive of it. <br />The Final Plat is consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat. The Final Plat does not include or reserve a road <br />corridor connection to Traprock St to the south in accordance with direction from City Council. The project does <br />include a trail from 159th Ave south to Traprock St that would be located on private property within the Subject <br />Property encumbered with a Trail Easement. Furthermore, the plans include stubbing a trunk water line south <br />(through the trail corridor) to the northern terminus of Traprock St and installation of a fire hydrant at the north end <br />of Traprock St for fire safety purposes for the Traprock Commons neighborhood. <br />The build out of the Woodlands site will eliminate the need for this Variance as it will create multiple ways to <br />access 159th Ave. As drafted, the Developer would be required to construct the bulb of the cul-de-sac if the <br />condition triggering the Variance is not eliminated within one (1) year of the recording of the Plat (essentially with <br />commencement of construction of another phase of the project), but would be eligible to seek an extension of time <br />with City Council approval. <br />When contemplating a variance request, there is a three (3) factor test for practical difficulties that must be met by <br />the Applicant. The following are the three (3) factors: <br />1. Is the property owner proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner? <br />2. Is the landowner's problem due to circumstances unique to the property and not caused by the landowner? <br />3. If granted, would the variance alter the essential character of the locality? <br />The proposed Final Plat is consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat and approval of the Preliminary Plat did <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.