Laserfiche WebLink
Case #4: Public Hearing - Request for Revised Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site <br />Plan Review of Ramsey Town Center 6th Addition; Case of D.R. Horton, Inc. <br />Chairperson Nixt closed the regular portion of the Planning Commission meeting at 8:47 p.m. in <br />order to call the public hearing to order. <br />Public Hearini <br />Chairperson Nixt called the public hearing to order at 8:47 <br />Presentation <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated D.R. Horton <br />of Ramsey Town Center 6th Addition in May <br />granted an extension of final plat approval until <br />some revisions to the original plat, thus requiring r <br />for the project. The Subject Property is west o <br />Horton's first phase of townhomes which are immediately w <br />approved plan had a total of 77 units (43 ro . . 'ts and <br />plan also shows 77 units, which will be <br />revision is to accommodate a change in <br />Ms. Geisler indicated the new buildin <br />approved rowhouse units. Sta <br />middle units within the buildi <br />requirements. Ms. Geisler <br />preliminary site plan of <br />with City Staff Review Le <br />Citizen <br />le <br />TT. <br />fin. . at approval <br />ovem. ty Council <br />D.R. Horto es to make <br />w prelimin. t and site plan <br />Center 2nd Addition, D.R. <br />ey Blvd. The previously <br />3 k .°ack units); the revised <br />. The _ ary reason for the plat <br />onstructed <br />different than the previously <br />e minor changes be made to the <br />meet setback and driveway length <br />t the revised preliminary plat and <br />ion be approved subject to compliance <br />n, state • ` units were platted by RTC a little over two years <br />things have occurred and D.R. Horton has chosen to redesign <br />y started with the redesign they received the public hearing <br />o more back to back units. This turned out to work well for <br />ance in that neighborhood. Mr. Mullenbach stated the new <br />is a similar layout to what they have in Block 1 of their first <br />urban feel to it, with steps up to the front door as opposed to a <br />n. There are a couple of items in the staff report to note. D.R. <br />the architecture as it is now, rather than the recommendation that the <br />ilding be brought out to the front. Currently two of the four units on a <br />typical building include that bump out, and they would like to keep that floor plan. D.R. Horton <br />would also like to continue putting the decks on the back of the homes, as they have done in <br />Block 1. They feel the decks add a lot of relief to the elevation, and many people actively use <br />those decks. <br />the <br />product <br />llenbach, <br />e that time, a n <br />out the same time <br />another builder <br />ms they have <br />in row <br />phase. It h <br />flat entry in the <br />Horton would pre e <br />area on the front of the <br />Commissioner Van Scoy inquired about staffs request for some changes to the elevations. <br />