04/05/73 Public Hearing - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-~ 3 - P&Z~-5-73 suggest a~ a rea~ona~le buffer zone between industrial and resi- dential property? M~.. Garter answered that if you want park area you ~:re not going to take it out of his lot. If you do then you will have to tak~ 0art of everyone's lot. At the last meeting it was ~u~igested tha~ ib should be 50 feet on each side of the line. Mro NeiLscn ref~,~rred ~o Section 28 the northeast two forties. The owner having a veste~ i~terest in the mobile home park, a great deal of money ha,~'; already been invested in the planning. Taking c-1 of i00 feet~ 250 ,feo, t or 300 feet from this property is just taking J.t from the owae~e. The owner wants the Planning and Zon- ing Commission ~,o consider this in their recommendation to the Town Boar¢~. We, are taking away his rights in this area. Mr. Reima~n sta1,~:4 ok:an?les had been made about the fencing around below gro~nd swimming pools. Mr. Miller. Sev~e-~ wa-3 ~aentioned by one of the supervisors. In Ramsey ']i'ownship we ha,~e so much sand that-water disappears. The state, he said~ would ?,?mit building on half acres lots along the Rum }fiver. Ramse? ?ownship can develop without sewer. Five acres i,~, too large a oi~,~ce of land to own when the sewer comes in. Mr. Co:× reolied, that v~~. have some plats where they have good per- colatior~ and we also .~aYe some low areas where even five acres is going to, h. ave trouble v,5 thout sewer. Mr. Lindse.~ ]is Rams:~y' Township rich, enough to go to five acres plats for each house? Ii. is land has not paid its way for the last 15 or 20 years~ !Ie i~'~:~?2te process of selling now. We are very arbitraril.v- changing bh~'~ value of his land. It is only a matter of time until t?~e sewer comes through. Then land will become tax delinquent. Once thi~ zoning law is passed then it will be a real problem to change it. I':e thinks this is confiscation. Mr. Mi].ler~ Or~ parks -- where do you put them and where do you get the money bo pay for !t~em? Mr. NeS. lso-,:~. Repre,~e:,~.t, ing A1 Bullick. In Section 3g adjacent to the Missis~ippi River t,his is where the tax base is and where it could be i'a this '.['own,~:;[15 p. He said this land is selling for $10,O00 and up per acres and ;~_ f~.ve acre piece would be $~0,O00 and up which 5.~ t,>o expensiv,~ for a house. He also has three quarters in a-1 zoning in ~ect'.o~, 8 which is 2½ acres per house. Some of this lar~d is in c,-.1 a:'ea also. Of the 120 acres, 2/3 of it is high land. Money has been spent to develop this area into one acre lots~. It would ~;e~:m that this should be r-1 district. Mr. Bullick pro~osed that 80 acres of it be put in ~-1 district and the rest o:17 it in c-~,l district. Why do we want 2½ acre tracts when the Hagen additi~,r~, just to the northeast is 1 acre lots? He ask~that the threo qu;~.r'ter sections be put into the r-1 district. This is th~,~ N ~ of SW ~ of Section $ and the NW ¼ of Section 8. He said th,~. green 'f~or-i:ion could remain as it was but he wants to develop the property trh~ch is high and rolling into 1 acre lots.