Laserfiche WebLink
CC Work Session 2. 2. <br />Meeting Date: 06/14/2016 <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Discussion Regarding the Process for the City Administrator's Annual Review <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this discussion is to review the process for the City Administrator's annual performance evaluation <br />which will occur later this fall. Staff is seeking feedback from the City Council regarding the process, steps, <br />methods, and/or core competencies to be evaluated. It is the hope that by having discussions now it will provide the <br />City Council with an opportunity to suggest and discuss any needed revisions for the next review period. <br />Moreover, improvements on the front end will very likely make for a more meaningful exchange between the City <br />Council and the City Administrator; all in pursuit of the City's mission to work together to responsibly grow our <br />community, and to provide quality, cost-effective, and efficient government services. <br />The current process is conducted in such a way as to comply with the City Administrator's Employment Agreement <br />and Minnesota Statute 13D.05 Subd. 3a. <br />Mr. Ulrich's employment agreement states, in part,: <br />6. Performance Evaluation. EMPLOYER and EMPLOYEE agree that a performance review will be conducted on <br />EMPLOYEE six (6) months after hire, one (1) year after hire, and annually thereafter. Said review shall be in <br />accordance with specific criteria developed jointly by CITY and EMPLOYEE. Said criteria may be added to or <br />deleted from as the COUNCIL may from time to time determine, in consultation with the EMPLOYEE. Further, the <br />CITY'S Mayor shall provide the EMPLOYEE with a summary written statement of the findings of the COUNCIL <br />and provide an adequate opportunity for the EMPLOYEE to discuss his evaluation with the COUNCIL. <br />Annually, the COUNCIL and EMPLOYEE shall define such goals and performance objectives that they determine <br />necessary for the proper operation of the CITY and for the attainment of the COUNCIL'S policy objectives and <br />shall further establish a relative priority among those various goals and objectives to be reduced to writing. The <br />goals and objectives shall generally be attainable within the time limitations specified and within the annual <br />operating and capital budgets and appropriations provided. <br />In effecting the provisions of this Section, the COUNCIL and EMPLOYEE mutually agree to abide by the <br />provisions of applicable law. <br />7. The COUNCIL shall conduct an annual 360 degree performance review of EMPLOYEE. Upon said performance <br />review, the City Council may, in its sole discretion, review the terms of this agreement and increase EMPLOYEE's <br />salary and/or benefits. <br />Minnesota Statute 13D.05, Subd. 3a states: <br />"A public body may close a meeting to evaluate the performance of an individual who is subject to its authority. <br />The public body shall identify the individual to be evaluated prior to closing a meeting. At its next open meeting, <br />the public body shall summarize its conclusions regarding the evaluation. A meeting must be open at the request of <br />the individual who is the subject of the meeting." <br />Summary of the Annual Process <br />In October of each year, the Human Resources Manager prepares a confidential 360 degree performance evaluation. <br />The evaluation covers the time period from September to September but is largely tied to the annual strategic plan <br />and goals. The process is completed when a resolution is passed accepting the City Administrator's annual <br />