Laserfiche WebLink
CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 06/14/2016 <br />Submitted For: Patrick Brama, Administrative Services <br />By: Patrick Brama, Administrative Services <br />7. 3. <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Future Business Park (Right of First Refusal Agreement to Purchase Real Estate) <br />Purpose/Background: <br />PURPOSE <br />Consider approving the attached agreement (Right of First Refusal Agreement) for land owned by Pearson <br />Properties located in the city's future business park. <br />BACKGROUND <br />The EDA and City Council reviewed a case RE the city's future business park in May (please see attached <br />alternatives for a summary, please see case memo, and case minutes, for details). <br />Below is a summary of direction received: <br />- --If the Pearson property is removed from the business park, the City will reconsider participation in funding <br />arterial infrastructure improvements to serve the Pearson property. <br />- --Alternative #2: help market and facilitate a sale of the Pearson property to a private developer/ investor. If <br />that avenue is exhausted (try for 6 months), the City would be willing to consider potentially purchasing. <br />- --Alternative #3: continue to work with (and monitor) Hageman Holdings on the development of their school <br />site. This option may result in surplus land, available to be converted for a business park. <br />Notification: <br />NA <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />NA <br />Funding Source: <br />NA <br />Recommendation: <br />The attached agreement does not obligate the city to purchasing the Pearson Property. The attached agreement has <br />no cash expense to the City. The attached agreement provides the City an opportunity to purchase the Pearson <br />Property. <br />Why is this important? <br />Based on direction received by the EDA/ Council in May, this case would possibly not come back to the City until <br />November/December 2016. In the meantime, Pearson Properties could sell their land to a different party. Said party <br />may have a vision to pursue development based on the current zoning (i.e. residential and retail). This agreement <br />allows the City, if they so desire, to consider avoiding said situation (via a potential purchase). <br />