Laserfiche WebLink
CASE <br /> <br />RE()UEST FOR SITE pLAN REVIEW; <br />(;AS '?~ OF BASALT PROPERTIES, LLP <br />B3: Megan Wald, Associate Planner <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Basalt Prop,_:rties, Ll ,P subrr itn_e::f a site plan to develop two commercial buildings on 4.48 <br />acres cfl~,ng Ebony Street in :h~,~ newl? created Basalt Office Park 2nd Addition. It should <br />Dc rncnt/on,:d that a minor s'.,tbd[vision and a Plalmed Unit Development zoning is being <br />processed in order to fitcili, ta:e tl~e proposed development. <br /> <br />The folh)wing item,s arc cn,,:l(;sed for your information: <br /> <br />Site pia~ <br />City St [k]" ['cv~cw fetter da[ed May 28, 2004 <br /> <br />Notil']calio~: <br /> <br />Site Pl;m.-~ d~ not ~:eq~ti~'e a pt. blip' hearing. <br /> <br />()hscrwtdo~s: <br /> <br />Basalt Prop,:riles, i~LI' is proposing to construct two 27,200 squm'e foot office and <br />warehouse buildings on I,ot i of E~asalt Of}ice Park 2nd Addition. City Code states that no <br />more tha~ ot~c main building ca~ be located on a parcel. The applicant is requesting the <br />C, itv re:×onc the property to P[iD in order to allow for the development of twvo main <br />buildings on thc subject pr(opt vt,,". <br /> <br />'['he City i:s 1)'ocessi '~g a mzo dna; of the property from E-2 to PUD. Since the property is <br />located wi[lnin an I~-~ district° it would seem appropriate to review the site plan under the <br />E-2 stancl:n:d:; noting ~hc rcequ~'sted dev[ation. <br /> <br />Thc site plato is n.~cedn5 ¢); exceeding the required setbacks. The development is <br />prr)posin!5 to construct at total o~' 54,400 square feet on a 4.48 acre parcel. Lot coverage <br />has I>ec~ calculated a~. ;!7%, vhicl~ is under the 45% maximum lot coverage restriction <br />estabtisl~crt in City <br /> <br />'Fhe ~ite will ~lerive one ~t.:ces~ point 1:i'()m Ebony Street. <br /> <br />Staff ch~:~:, m,t have ct-.mgh n:l'~>rmation to determine if the site plan meets, off-street <br />parking ¥~acu requirements. ~1 his information must be provided to staffprior to the City <br />Council review ol:' thc .;itc plm. <br /> <br />'l'he ~_;adi% '~md draina~c pla~ is generally acceptable with the revisions outlined in the <br />(;it),' Stai'f' I~.c,'iew Letter. <br /> <br />37 <br /> <br /> <br />