Laserfiche WebLink
Assistant (.'o~nmu~'~ity [)evel{,pmer i. ])irector Trudgeon stated Mr. Bauer is in attendance, as are <br />thc two affected pi'operty owners. [-I,~' stated fi'om Staff's position they are still comfortable with <br />approval o[' Iht: v~riatamo, bttt the w~ ,rcli ng needs to be amended in the findings of fact. <br /> <br />Commission Inp~t <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt indicated in ligln,~, oi' the knowledge that the City has granted a variance with <br />road fro atagc ~)f 66 l:'cct, [q¢)w else might this information have impacted the variance if it had <br />bccn known itt thc time el' thc reqtt~:sl. <br /> <br />Assistant Co~ma~_mity Devct{)pm~ nt Director Trndgeon stated it probably would not have <br />alit:cored thc xqlt'i;_t~/cc, but what 2, ti(l was affect the platting process and the access that would <br />have come fl'(ma l(~f)tI' l~anc. <br /> <br />Chairpcrs(m Nixt ~skcd i:l't[~c appli,:a;~ would access the property from 161st Lane NW. <br /> <br />Assistant ( k>~mu~ity Dcvc:l(qome~ 1 )irector Trudgeon indicated he would unless something was <br />worked out bt~'Lwcc:~ thc oYvlqCl'S. <br /> <br />Steve l)usbabc'k, 7191 16t:~ [~an,: XiW indicated he takes exception to one .thing Assistant <br />Conmmnity [)cvciopment Director 'l't'ttdgeon stated, which was that the 66 feet of frontage was <br />nc)t taken into acc-trent back in O~:tcber. lie noted the 66 feet and 105 feet of frontage were <br />loci<cd at t%cthcr Yvhcn considcrir.'.g tl~c variance. He asked why Ramsey has City Codes i£they <br />are just ~()in~ it) ~,_~'elnt val'ig~nces. <br /> <br />Chaiq¢crstm N i x.t :tdvised the i)urp, ~st'~ k'or City Codes is to provide structure, which is the reason <br />they also have a x/:.ttqance prt)¢~ss, >ecause in some cases enforcement of:the codes may result in <br /> <br />Chaiqgcrs(>n ~ixt ~,sutttccl lac: looks .it it as a property with eleven acres that except for the road <br />fi:enrage h~ls nar)re than enough opp )ri:~ mity to subdivide. He indicated he looks at it as relief. <br /> <br />l lom'd Mcmlgc~' l~ r',mcr acld(.~'c[ that; c(:~::s~ from 161 st Lane NW was not precluded in the variance, <br />but GOth l.:mc NV,,' was c[¢anc~' <br /> <br />Chairperson b~ixt agree& :4rating i~_ was clear the applicant had that option, and they had that <br />discussion dtu'ing thc origi~al var;a~ce hearing. He indicated while Mr. Dusbabek's point is <br />notccl, hc w()tt[d imve c()rnc I:o t[~,,'~ s:tme ,:onclusion in the previous review. He stated with <br />potential clcvclop~cnt in thc I'utm,: tt~id the fact the Commission is not granting anything that <br />would n()t Igc ~.t'a~a[(;cl to a~othcr la ~c!,,~wner in a similar situation, that he is comfortable with the <br />d. ccision. <br /> <br />Motion by ('hairl)crson Nixt, s~ct~cit:(_t by Board Member Jeffrey to adoPt Resolution #04-05- <br />107 adopting ;m~e~qctcd Firstlings oi' 17',tct ;~0653 relating to Greg Bauer's request for a variance <br />fi-om thc stl'cct f'r;,lllage of lot widtl, r,:~', tire~nent. <br /> <br />Ilea 'd ~;f Adjustment/May 6, 2004 <br /> Page 5 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />