Laserfiche WebLink
Motion carried. Voting Yes: (2h;4r?rson Johns, Commissioners LaMere, Shryock, Lehman, <br />Olds, and Ponti~ts. Voting No: No~e. Absent: Commissioner Ostrum. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns ~oted the: websit(: needed to be updated with the time change. <br /> <br />Case #7: Tobacco Free Park~ <br /> <br />Civil Engineer il I inton stated the C/tv received information on making the parks tobacco free. <br />Implementation of this policy woul:t c,:quire a new ordinance and draft ordinance language was <br />included. Hc explained tobacco w~st{: required a lot of maintenance time and eliminating this <br />waste in thc City's parks would mai~e them look better and free staffto work on other parts of the <br />parks. Enforcem~:nt of this poli.~y would require support of the Ramsey Youth Athletic <br />Association (RheA/\) and other grot p:; !hat hold regularly scheduled events in the parks. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer II Linton stated tl~e ¢:ommission is asked to make a motion regarding this <br />proposal. An a£fi~ative motion sl ~ouid include forwarding the proposal to the City Council for <br />creation and adoption of the ordinar ce. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer fi Imton noted a la~ ~;~: ~mmbcr of handouts were available for review, as this had <br />been implemented in many cilics. <br /> <br />Commissioner ()Ids asked if'there wottld be signage in the parks. <br /> <br />Principal City Engineer Olson resi,o~ded he went to a meeting with Anoka County and there <br />were grant opporttmities to pay fo~ signs throughout the parks, along with flyers and handouts <br />containing information. A prese,~talion ,,vas given regarding other cities that had adopted <br />tobacco-fi'cc parks and he noted, ttere was not a great deal of enforcement that took place, as <br />strong enforcen~cm could be seen ts s()ciety "picking on certain people" because smoking areas <br />were continually disappearing, tt vould give people working with youth activities the fight to <br />prohibit stuck lng during thost: activities-;. <br /> <br />Chairperson 2[ohns asked if ii shoul{i be an ordinance or a policy. <br /> <br />Principal City [2ngmeer Olson resp,,nded it would be a policy change; however, if the City began <br />enforcement, an ordinance would n~:ed to be introduced for an enforcement technique. He asked <br />if the Commission wanted an ordin: <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns respond(x! a policy was a good begimfing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lehman sta~cd he t~ought it was a great idea for the health of the community's <br />children, as parks should be places 'to improve health and wellbeing. Most public facilities were <br />becoming tobacco fi~ce and the pol/;y would give residents a feeling that they had the fight to say <br />something. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olds asked if there x./aa anything that identified alcohol use in City parks. <br /> <br />Park and F~ecreation Commission/April 8, 2004 <br /> Page 16 of 21 <br /> <br /> <br />