My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 05/04/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2004
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 05/04/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:46:36 PM
Creation date
6/1/2004 11:10:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
05/04/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(¢otmcilmcmbc,' l~lvig ClUcslioncd t~x,.., enforceable it was for the City to make sure the systems <br />arc nmintaincrl. <br /> <br />lZi~'c Inspector Strc:ich rcplicxl that i' th,.: ordinance is adopted it would be a misdemeanor if the <br /> <br />Councilmcml, c~ (k~ol< stated that he would like to see a list of businesses that would be available <br />to do such <br /> <br />lVirc Inspector Strcich replied that ti~e sprinkler systems can be installed by a master plumber in <br />rcsidcntial units o~-by thc property c~wncr themselves. <br /> <br />(:onscnsus of tl~c ( lily Council wa ~ to direct staff to forward a case to the next City Council <br />meeting pmvidi~g ;mswers io all of' i. hcir questions. <br /> <br />COUl~Ci lmcml,cl-K tu'al< arrived <br /> <br />2) NW Bridg{~ (:rossb~g l)eve~opment <br /> <br />City AdminislYato~ Norma~ ~;xplair~ed that a Northwest River Crossing Study was completed <br />rcccntly lhat establishes t~ transty~rta~tion corridor with a future bridge crossing over the <br />Mississipt, i Riv~:r smtth to Intcrstat( ~94 in Maple Grove. While this co~idor has been identified <br />in a Scoping 1 ){,cument, thc ~ffficial mapping process has yet to begin. ~ addition there has been <br />discussion about what will happen ,vit}~ Highway ~169. There is a proposal being discussed that <br />once I lighway/,"(>1 (~ is completed, ~169 would join the new ~610 and then come north to the new <br />northwest cor~'i~lo~' routc. As they reached completion of the study a new issue came up from <br />Shcrburnc C(m~ty ~md A~oka C(tm~y indicating that perhaps ~169 should join up in the <br />corn m crc iai aYo~t of' l~lk Rivc~'. The reason the issue is before the Council is that staff has learned <br />in recent xvccks th~,t development p:e~;~<~res along the proposed no~hwest river crossing corridor <br />arc signilSoanlly ()~ the increase. ~ta['l' wanted to discuss the need to continue working with <br />transporlation consultants tt~ dcvelo9 a formal transpo~ation con'idor along the proposed Bul~<er <br />I.al<o Bo u low~'d al ~,.l pt)ssi b ly lq i ghx, ay//. 169 in preparation for an official mapping designation. <br /> <br />Assistant ( 'o~n~nu~ity Dcv¢~qOl¢incnt I)irector Trudgeon reviewed the proposed co~Tidor of the <br />lk~turc rivc~' b~'idgc crossinu., lie c:.plained that development is more eminent in this area than <br />~hcy ~md lhought o~c year' ~g(}. Development in the con'idor will probably occur before the State <br />tad<cs any ~cti~ o~', thc rivcr bridgc cr<>ssing. If that occurs the City needs to be ready to try and <br />preserve whc~-c ibc City believes th~ c{~rridor should be, which is difficult because the EIS, once <br />complctcd, ~a~y idcnti[~ a alii'fo'chi location. Recently staff has had discussions with <br />rcprcscntativcs Ib~- one of tl-~e p~-opc 'ty owners and they have indicated that they would be willing <br />to prcscrwz a 300 Ibot corridor For tl~: crossing if the density they lose in that co~Tidor can be <br />made up clscwl~cr(: on thc propcrty At this point staff feels that xvould be a good option for the <br /> <br />City Co~m:il Work Session/May 4, 2004 <br /> Page 3 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.