Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Shardlow i-q>licd that hc has vcfifi~:d that a 300-foot corridor would be needed. <br /> <br />Mayor (lame,,: imiuircd iff Ibc Cil'~, ('otmcil agreed with the concept of allowing for higher <br />densities on lh~: Nathc prOl-~crty in ,:xchange for the 300-foot corridor for the future river bridge <br />crossing. <br /> <br />Councihncm}~c~-(:r~ok ropli~xl yes. <br /> <br />Councihnumbe~' Zimmerman state( that he thought it ,,vas the only option the City had at this <br />point. <br /> <br />(_iOtlt~cilmcmbc~' S!lx)mmcn stated t:~ai: she thought they should proceed forward, but she did not <br />want to shut lhc dc, or on re!aining l ~e park corridor because it was riverfront property and one of <br />the (!ity's goals is ~o provide accessibility to the river. <br /> <br />Councilmembc~' Kt~rak staled that d~c ,,,,,anted to 1hake it clear that she was not talking about <br />allowing fbr building on lh¢ idon. tiiicd park area; she was talking about, for value purposes, the <br />land has more valttc if the entire a~ ea along the river is not designated as parkland. It gives the <br />property owner so~e righls to rix'erlm~t property. <br /> <br />Mi-. Shardlow i~cttlircd i£th~zy should :start working with the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Assistant (fore.nullity Dcvdopmei.t [~irector Trudgeon replied that initially they would begin <br />work ing with staff' i.o discuss what tac ~'~oxt steps should be. <br /> <br />Mr. Shardlow stated that tlney arc i~, th~: process of putting a plan together to maximize the value <br /> thc lamt based on its current zoni~g and then they will be looking at different alternatives. <br /> <br />City Administrato~' Norman noted that sta~'f will bring back a case to the next City Council <br />meeting to aull~ori×c Thc Tinklen/:erg group to work on developing a transportation policy as <br />well as thc rivci' bridge crossing an( th,.: C.R. #116 extension. <br /> <br />Mayor (htmc(: recessed thc City Co,mcil work session at 7:25 p.m. <br /> <br />Mayor (htmcc call¢.;d the (5ry ('omn.:il work :~ession back to order at 7:32 p.m. <br /> <br />3) ()l}porlm;ity I)evelopmcnl Plmming <br /> <br />City Administ~'ator Norman stated that the City Council discussed Opportunity Development <br />P latin lng d uti n?, a work session on 'd:uch i 6th. During the meeting on April 5th, the Council met <br />in a work session with repres;cntati yes from the Met Council to discuss the impact opportunity <br />dcVdOlmlcnt I~as ~)n tho colnpreh.msive planning process. Councilmembers have requested <br />ft~rthcr discttssi~)n ~m the 1,1~t~ming p~'occss [br the opportunity development project. <br /> <br />City Core,oil Work Session/May 4, 2004 <br /> Page 8 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />