Laserfiche WebLink
Chairperson N i xt asl<cd if tl~c applicanl had reviewed the Staff review letter. <br /> <br />Mi'. ,Iohnson st:.~tcd he has, and has ~o problems with it. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt a:&cd if there was a lighting plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson stated it would be coming in on Monday. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt a~ked if there was a screened waste area. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson stated it is on thc plan. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson N ix t, seconded by Commissioner Shepherd to reco~end that the City <br />Council granl approval of the prot)oscd site plan contingent upon compliance with City Staff <br />Review I,ettcr dated April 30., 2004 and resolution of the sewer and water access issues prior to <br />bringing thc site plan to thc City Council, and reflecting applicant's request for fencing and the <br />correlating reduction in landscaping <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Cha~rpe~'son Nixt, Commissioners Shepherd, Brauer and Jeffrey. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Johnson, Van Scoy and Watson. <br /> <br />Case #6 <br /> <br />Request for Site Pla,~ Review; Case of Sharp and Associates <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Associatc PI anncr (~ci stcr a¢lviscd S harp and Associates is proposing to construct a 3,825-square- <br />R)ot office and warehouse building that will be occupied by Northern Technologies Inc. on the <br />property generally located at the cc-met of 141st Avenue and Basalt Street. She stated the new <br />of'rice and warehouse building is l,>cated in the E-1 Employment District and is considered a <br />permitted usc in this district. She indicated the subject property is approximately 1.03 acres in <br />size. I,ot coverage Ibr the proposed project is approximately 8.5%. She stated the proposed site <br />plan meets thc rcquh'cd front, mar, and side yard setbacks. <br /> <br />Associmc Planner {, ;cislcr further advised the landscaping plan is acceptable, and the grading and <br />drainage plan will need to be revised to address the comments outlined in the City Staff review <br />letter. Sbt indicated the exterior materials are proposed to be concrete masonry units. <br /> <br />Associate Planner (ieislcr statt;d the current site plans are showing access from an area that is not <br />currently improved, and Staff is rec(,mmending that access not be put in at this time. <br /> <br />Commission in pm <br /> <br />Chairperson N i xt ay;ked if the applicator had received the Staff Review Letter. <br /> <br />Plann ing Commission/May 6, 2004 <br /> Page 11 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />