Laserfiche WebLink
Cily/Xdn~inislmto~ Norman rcpliec: that based on the discussion that has taken place it appears <br />that staff has approached the [ [ICA isst~.e incorrectly. He suggested that they work out the issues <br />with thc i~I)A, bui he also felt thai th,zre were some valuable reasons to establish an HRA for <br />residential <br /> <br />Councihncinbc~' ('ook stated that il they cal~ answer the question do they need an HRA beyond <br />the fact that them may be problems with the EDA then they should be moving forward. At this <br />time it. seems lhat ii,crc is a need fo~ eslablishing an HRA. <br /> <br />C, ouncilmcmbcr S/l'ommcn stated lhat she thought the process would work a lot better if they <br />establish specific ~oals to each group or' areas to each group. <br /> <br />Councilmcmbcr El rig requested that st;tffbrJng back better information on the uses of the HRA. <br /> <br />City Adn~inistrator Norman stated li2at the City does not have a lot of background with the HRA <br />so hc suggested uli}izing so~nc expel'rise on the issue. <br /> <br />Conscnsus of thc (iity Council was to direct staff to seek additional expertise on the uses of an <br />lIRA and Ibrwm'd ~ case to Ibc City Co~mcil. <br /> <br />5) l,;nforcement o£ Sigu Ordi~mnce <br /> <br />Corn m unity l)cvcl ot)me~t Di rector !;rotik provided the City Council with an outline of the issues <br />related to thc cnR~'ccment of the sign code and questioned how proactive the Council wanted <br />staff to bc r%arclin?~ the removal of llcgal signs. <br /> <br />Councilmcmbc~' Zi~nmerman stated ~ h.a~_ be thought they should remove them all or do nothing. <br /> <br />Mayor Gm]mc stated that he thoughl they should all be removed. <br /> <br />Councilmcmbcr El',;ig suggested th;4 staff clean up the right of way and then put a notice in the <br />R~tmscy Rc,~'hh'~! that the City is goi% to be enforcing the code. <br /> <br />Cotmcilmcmbcr C(,ok noted that th,: infimnation in the Ramsey Resident wouldn't reach any of <br />tim buildcrs. <br /> <br />C, ouncilmcmbcr Elvig replied that they already know that their signs should not be located in the <br />right of way. <br /> <br />Councilmcmbc~' K t~rak questioned ii' they would remove crosses that are located in the right of <br />way where somcont; has Iosl lhcir li!~. <br /> <br />Consensus oi'~he ('~ty Cotmc:il :vats lhat crosses should be left. <br /> <br />City Cmmcil Work Session/May 4, 2004 <br /> Page 13 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />