Laserfiche WebLink
Cotmeil m emhe~' K u rak q ue~tioned if there is room to put a City street in this area. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Ol:.;on replied the street would not have the acceptable setbacks <br />that a normal subdivision would need. Taking the street over as a City street would definitely <br />crcaio a loophole it; that no one would come in for subdivision, but would say they want a private <br />street. A flor thc building was done lhcy would likely say they now want the street to be public. <br /> <br />Councilmcmbcr Cr~ok indicaled th~' (ommittee discussed that at this point the City has no <br />intention of taking thc street over ~-ts :t public street, but they would help the association get <br />in formation on impl'ovemcnts for th~& road so they can get up to public standards on their own. <br /> <br />Assistanl Public Works Director Oisor~ explained his intention is to write a letter outlining the <br />Council's discu.~;sion, saying they w.)uld need a letter from the association stating they would be <br />willing to pay thc };400, as well as :allowing the City to enter on their private property to do the <br />xvorl<. Ifc will malco it clear that thc Cily cun'ently has no intention of taking the street over. The <br />association lnay dec:ldo att a late~' clat,.z to take this back to the Council. <br /> <br />Coutmihnembcr l!ilvig indicated he thinks this group is aware that the City is not interested in <br />taking over private streets, which w)uld set a bad precedent. They previously thought they may <br />bc an exception, but now they know they are not. The association wants to know what they need <br />to do to get to thc public street st~;tus, Doing a soil boring would help the association, and <br />would help thc Ciiy as well as to know if this is even feasible. The boring will be at the <br />association's cost. <br /> <br />Councihnelnbcl' Ziimncrman rcport.xt the recolnmendation of the Committee was to spend the <br />$400 and be rcimbtirscd by thc; assot'iation. <br /> <br />Motion by Cotmcihnember Zimm,mnan, seconded by Councilmember Cook, to ratify the <br />r¢commcnctatio~]s ,)1' the Pcrsonnci Committee for Case 2, recommend that staff continue <br />working with tllc Met Council on tl-~e issue of a new station, Case 4, adopt the Policy Regarding <br />Placement oF the YVcar Course Bitumim)us Lift, and Case 6, hire Northern Technologies at a not <br />to exceed cosl of ~400 contingent [,pon the Rum River Hills Townhouse Association issuing a <br />letter agreeing to t!~c reimbursclneint and alloxving the soil boring to be done on their private <br />property. <br /> <br />Motio~ tan'lcd. Voting Yes: Mayo~ (i:_.'mec, Councihnembers Zimmerman, Cook, Elvig, Kurak, <br />Pearson, and Nt~'on~mcn. Voting No None. <br /> <br />Case #6: <br /> <br />Intrmluce Amendment to City Code Section 4.40.06 Subdivision 10 Relating <br />to ~,¥atcr Use Restrk:tions <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Oison explained this amendment to the City Code relates to <br />water use restrictio~s and stttff recor:m~cnds approval. <br /> <br />City Council/May 11, 2004 <br />Page 14 of 36 <br /> <br /> <br />