Laserfiche WebLink
20 Minutes <br /> <br />CASE #11: <br /> <br />DIS(J3SS F~KSJRE I~ANS FOR INDUSTRIAL/ <br /> t~]SIN~'ISS SI~WER AND WATER <br /> By: Pete Raatikka, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />On February 18~ 1987 the Econo, Lie Development Commission reviewed two new <br />alternate alignments for pr~idi,]g sewer and water to the Industrial Area. The <br />objective of the alternates i~ to provide service to the intersection of <br />Industry Avenue NW and Su~tfish Lake Blvd. NW at a minimal cost and also provide <br />service to the south side of Hi~,~y ~10 NWo Alternate No. 1 would provide the <br />Highway %10 N& cro.~sing at T[tu.g~ten Street NW while Alternate No. 2 provides a <br />crossing of Highway #10 B~ at Su~iJsh L~ke Blvd. B~. Alternate No. 2 is more <br />costly but it wo~L].d provide m.~r(, flexibility for future expansion of the <br />system. <br /> <br />Phase No. 1 of the water ,%~stem wo~ld provide service to the intersection of <br />Industry Avenue NW and Sunfish Lake Blvd. NW and Phase No. 2 would extend <br />service across Highway ~,10 <br /> <br />The Economic Development O_)m,~is,~ ion passed a motion recommending that the City <br />Council proceed wi~h Alternate No, 2, Phases No. 1 and 2 of the sewer, and <br />Alternate No. 1,, Phase ~b,~ ] of th~ water° <br /> <br />Enclosed are copies of the al tcrnates and estimated costs. The City <br />Administrator is workir~g on ~. revised estimate of revenues which can be <br />generated by the ~.ax increment district° The revenue projections will be <br />available at the C,~)unci.! ~etin~ <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Council action should be, ~tsed ,)n t-evic~ of revenue projections and your review <br />of the projected projects° <br /> <br />Peview Checklist: <br /> <br />Administr ato~ .... <br />Attorney <br />Engineer ~ <br />Con~i~ Develo~,ient " .... ~ <br /> <br />Chief of Police <br />Finance Officer <br />Public Works Superintendent <br />Other <br /> <br /> <br />