Agenda - Council - 03/24/1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Disadvantages to ~rMMI ?..ii Proposal (City Perspective) May incur additi~na], costs for placement of thicker cover, perimo, ter f~nce ~'or ski area. I Would incur cost~ for roadway grading and olean-up day (clean.-up day' wa~.tes estimated at less than 0.2% of annual volum~ to be tancfilled) ~ wi].li. ~'equire increased, coordination with regulatory agencies' to permit and co}trol recreation use on landfill. PRO'S AN[} {!ON'S ~. CITY Benefits to the City ~or A~proval of Agreement Based on Committmen~s Made in the Proposal: I Ga'in i!imited seasonal recreation area which otherwise woul.dr~'t exJ.st. I ReceiYe R.O~W. loc segment of 153rd which otherwise may need to be acquired. i Potential for sav[~g grading costs on 153rd. ® Cl~-an--~up day cont..hued for City residents. Disadvantages to the C[t~[ for Approval of Agreement Based on Committments Made in t~:~j~_~r__o_posal: I Contin~ing landfill activity unsettling to residents in ~r~. I Approw~l of an ag:~?eement prior to completion of other related studies m~y not be in the best interests of the City. Approw~l of conti~med landfill activities may jeopardize federal!, airport funds for improvements. Once entered into a "partnership" with the landfill owner or operator, the entire issue of liability may be extremely cloudy and subjec~ to numerous challenges. City will incur a] 1 expenses for site amenities to develop a ski/sledding hJ.ll and associated facilities (e.g, parking). city will incur a] 1 expenses associated with management operations and. ma~%tenance of the ski facility. Unless operated as a net revenue producing facility, costs of running the facility will be an annual expense item (i.e, liab.tltty insuranca~ site access control, enforcement, etc.) 8