My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/24/1987
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1987
>
Agenda - Council - 03/24/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2025 1:39:23 PM
Creation date
6/8/2004 10:49:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/24/1987
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
areas ~uch as food xc~ice, equipment m~tenance, job <br />trainins, and m~ica~ ,upport. <br /> <br />It is advnntngeou.% to have more ~hn~l one <br />supplier if maximum cost ~vl~ are to be <br />enptured. To trade one monopoly, iovernment <br />provision, for another monopoly., private <br />provision, ts not likely to be veo hdpfnl. <br /> <br /> A third factor affecting the ava~labili~.~ of contractors <br />is the sovernment itself. Some contractors refuse any <br />government work,, while others won't contract with cer- <br />tain governments. St~! others increase the s~.e of their <br />overhead charsc~ when dcalini~ with $ov~tment.t~ The <br />reluctance to deal with government is v~ually a reflec- <br />tion of past experiences invol~-$ cxc~ive red tape, <br />exce~ive bonds or ~iability waivers, s.~ow payments, <br />political shcnanif~ans~ and in some ca~s outright cor- <br />ruption.~ Thc~e are problems th~ a sovecflmen~ can <br />correct ~iven interest and time, but th~~ may be a real <br />impediment to contracting, at legist in ~c short nm. <br /> <br />Administrative Oonlrol. Thc succes~ of roany service <br />contracts rests on good administrative control by the <br />contracting $ovcrnment. One c~ty m~er noted that it <br />is much more difficult to administer amtract services <br />than inhouse services because "contraa~ don't think." <br />Although many governments assume that_ once the con- <br />tract has been si~ned their job is finishe~, this is not the <br />case, because the constraints are real. <br /> While a contract may contain detaile~ specifications, <br />someone must be on hand to ensure that they arc foL <br />lowed. Also there arc always factors lcf~ uncovered by <br />eva~y contract. If thc local government do~ not have <br />someone on hand to mon/tor thc contras.~ thc contractor <br />will bc tempted to take the easy way (~ut, often with <br />inconveniences for c~tizcns and di~astr~,u~ results for <br />thc governm.ent. <br /> Proper administrative control starts wL:h a weft-drawn <br />contract including a detailed del'tuition (~f thc aery/ce to <br />be performed, its out~uts, important qual/ty character- <br />istic~, and penalties for nonpcrformance~ One city man- <br />ager included thc city staff who monitor~t and inspected <br />contractor work Jn thc contract drafting p:'oce~ to ensure <br />thc indus/on of proper safeguards. Crotn! purchase of <br />aery/ce contracts rest as much on contract formtdation <br />as any other single consideration. <br /> A good contract is a good base for a ~uc~essful pur- <br /> chase of service agreement, but ~t is al~o necessary to <br /> ensure that the tcrm~ of any agreement are ~ ful- <br /> rifled. ~ requires periodic inspcctiom rcl~ular mc~- <br /> inEs with thc contrac/or, and thc va~n~(te~s to impose <br /> sanctions if need be. <br /> <br />Transitional Factors. Success in contracting will depend <br />partly on how weft the shift or tr~_n~tion to contractina <br />is made. (Jetting off tm the Mona foot can be fatal, and <br />can affect all future contracfina efforts. <br /> There are four types of transitions, each with its own <br />set of problems: <br /> <br />· Movina from no service to contract serviceolikely to <br /> be the simplest transition for there are normally no <br /> institutional impediments. <br />· Moving from contru:t serv~ to government service-= <br /> usually made under traumatic circumstances---the <br /> contractor has defaulted, has not provided acceptable <br /> service, or has raised the price dramatically. <br />· Moving from contract service to contract service-- <br /> common transition that can raise serious problcms. <br />· Moving from government service to contract service~ <br /> type of transition likely to be thc most difficult be- <br /> cause of institutional rigidities. <br /> <br />Thc ease of transition ~di be affected by many consider- <br />ations includins the type of service, experience of the <br />contractor, contract visibility, and role of government <br />leaders. Contract services that have much public con- <br />tact, like garbage collection, arc likely to be much more <br />of a challenge than are inte~tuediate services that are <br />used by the government. The contractor's knowledge of <br />the jurisdiction, experience in delivering thc service, and <br />ability to cope with the unexpected will play an impor- <br />tant role in the tr~n-_~tion. Fmally, the visibility of the <br />contract to the public, the interest of the media, the cir- <br />annstances under which it was awarded, and the sup- <br />port of the el_,~__~ body will affect the ease of transition. <br /> The transitional pangs will also be eased with careful <br />planning and continuous monitoring. One practitioner <br />offers the following suggestions: <br /> <br />· Keep the public informed of the change and warned <br /> of possible problems <br />· Keep the elected officials and the media up-to-date on <br /> any problems, and what is being done to solve them <br />· Keep employees informed of any chaises <br />· Hold regular meetings with the contractor.** <br /> <br /> Competition. A degree of competition amona suppliers <br /> is not a requirement for local government contracting, <br /> but it helps insure that a government will ma~miTe its <br /> savings. Normally thc larger thc number of suppliers thc <br /> greater the competition. However, since collusion some- <br /> times exists among firms the number of potential sup- <br /> pliers is not alwa~ a perfect measure of the degree of · <br /> competition. Also, one efficient firm and a knowledge- <br />able local government official can often agree to a con- <br />tract that costs no more than if there were a number of <br />· potential suppliers. <br /> To assess the degree of competition in contracting it is <br /> necessary to examine the way the contracts are written <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.