Laserfiche WebLink
te\/M <br />CERTIFIED PUBLIC <br />ACCOUN I -ANTS <br />INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT <br />ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE <br />To the City Council and Management <br />City of Ramsey, Minnesota <br />PRINCIPALS <br />Thomas Me Montague, CPA <br />Thomas A. K.arnowski, CPA <br />Paul A. Radosevieh, CPA <br />William J. Lauer, CPA <br />James H. Eichren, CPA <br />Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA <br />Victoria L. Holinka, CPA <br />We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of <br />America, and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, <br />issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental <br />activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of <br />the City of Ramsey, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, and the related <br />notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and <br />have issued our report thereon dated May 31, 2016. <br />MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE <br />The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, promulgated by the Office of the State Auditor <br />pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 6.65, contains seven categories of compliance to be tested: contracting <br />and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, claims and <br />disbursements, miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing. Our audit considered all of the <br />listed categories. <br />In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City failed to <br />comply with the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, except as <br />described in the Schedule of Findings and Responses as item 2015-001. However, our audit was not <br />directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. Accordingly, had we performed <br />additional procedures, other matters may have come to our attention regarding the City's noncompliance <br />with the above referenced provisions. <br />CITY'S RESPONSE TO FINDING <br />The City's response to the finding identified in our audit is included in the accompanying Schedule of <br />Findings and Responses. The City's response was not subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the <br />audit of the financial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on it. <br />PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT <br />The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance and the results of <br />that testing, and not to provide an opinion on compliance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any <br />other purpose. <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota <br />May 31, 2016 <br />-3- <br />Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich, & Co., P.A. <br />5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis. MN 55416 • Tclephonc. 952-545-0424 • Telefax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.corr <br />