Laserfiche WebLink
OW t hi lon: To work together ko respotibiy grow oar community, and to provide quality, cost -affective, and efckent government tet does. <br />CC Regular Session 7. 5. <br />Meeting Date: 06/28/2016 <br />By: Bruce Westby, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Adopt Resolution #16-06-126 Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Bids for Improvement Project <br />#16-00 Division Al, Sealcoat Improvements. <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Purpose: <br />The purpose of this case is to adopt Resolution #16-06-126 approving plans and specifications and authorizing <br />advertisements for bids for Improvement Project #16-00 Division Al, Sealcoat Improvements. <br />Background: <br />As part of the city's long-term Street Maintenance Program, various city streets receive cracksealing and sealcoating <br />improvements each year to help maximize the life expectancy of the street pavement sections. Cracksealing of <br />streets prevents stormwater runoff from seeping through cracks in the pavement and through joints between the <br />pavement and concrete curb and gutter and/or utility castings, reducing the potential for future pavement damage <br />due to wet subgrade soils, especially as a result of freeze -thaw cycles. Sealcoating streets helps protect pavement <br />from the negative effects of stormwater runoff, ultraviolet rays from the sun, and oil based by-products that are <br />deposited on pavement surfaces by vehicles. <br />As discussed in a previous case this evening, bids for the first proposed 2016 sealcoat project were opened June <br />21st. When reviewing bids, Staff observed that quantities for four of the fifteen bid items in the bid proposal were <br />between 7% and 23% less than the quantities associated with the proposed design as shared with Council on May <br />24th. In addition, based on the lowest responsible bid over $150,000 would have remained unspent from the <br />$500,000 budgeted for sealcoats in 2016. Staff therefore used the bid proposal quantities to revise the proposed <br />project scope by removing 2.66 miles of street segments from the original project to allow the City to accept bids <br />and award a contract for construction to the lowest responsible bidder. The purpose of this second 2016 sealcoat <br />project is to use the remainder of the $500,000 budgeted annually for sealcoats. Staff therefore prepared the attached <br />plans for a second 2016 sealcoat improvements project which proposes to sealcoat 5.47 miles of municipal streets <br />in the City. The attached plan sheets show the locations of all streets proposed to receive sealcoat improvements <br />with this project. Specifications are not attached but will be available for review at the Council meeting, if needed. <br />Also attached is a cost estimate for the proposed improvements, including cost breakouts for each street segment. <br />As noted on pages 1 and 2, Staff is proposing limited fog sealing in the Ramsey Meadows 2nd Addition so the <br />newly sealcoated streets will better blend into adjacent streets which are newer. The total estimated cost for <br />fogsealing is $523. <br />Staff is proposing to use Dresser trap rock to sealcoat all streets in lieu of standard granite rock chips to ensure an <br />adequate supply of rock is available as discussed in a previous case tonight. Based on bids received this week for <br />the first sealcoat project, staff does not anticipate receiving higher bid prices for specifying trap rock over granite <br />