Laserfiche WebLink
and supporters can beforced totry todisprove orcontextua|izenegativeaopectoof <br />affordable housing, regardless of whether they are real or perceived. <br />Common concerns about affordable housing <br />Concorn: Affordable h4LISiDg lowers nearby P[4p8rt« VIRI8S. <br />Reality: Research has found that affordable housing has no long-term negative impact <br />on surrounding property v8|ueo.mArecent study on the relationship between affordable <br />developments located in Dakota, Hennepin, Scott, and Washington counties and single- <br />family home sales revealed: average sales prices rose by nearly 5%, demand remained <br />stable, affordable developments did not make it more difficult for owners tosell, and <br />market performance of homes near affordable development was at least as strong as that <br />of more distant homes in 96% of cases." Conversely, properly designed and managed <br />affordable housing can have a positive impact on surrounding property values. The design, <br />management, and maintenance of any residential property determine whether or not it is a <br />detriment or asset to its neighbors, regardless of the income of its inhabitants. <br />Concorn: Affordable housing leads to higher crime rates. <br />Reality: The relationship between crime rates and subsidized housing has been studied in <br />many ways and in many parts of the country. It can be difficult to say exactly what impact <br />a new affordable housing development might have on neighborhood crime. However, most <br />available research finds no conclusive evidence that an increase in affordable housing <br />(whether residents or units) leads to an increase in crime. For example, a study of three <br />federally subsidized housing developments in Milwaukee and Washington [}.C.f0und no <br />increase incrime, ineither the pr ject'oneighborhoodoradjacentneighborhoodo.The <br />study, infact, found decreases incrime ayear after the affordable housing projects vvere <br />constructed." Another study looked at the impact of Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers in <br />10 cities across the U.S. and found no association between the arrival of voucher holders in <br />aneighborhood and the incidence ofcrime one year |ater2» <br />These are just two examples of research on various types of affordable housing and crime in <br />various cities, but they illustrate 8 c0rnrn0n conclusion: there is little evidence that affordable <br />housing causes increased crime. While factors such as the quality of property management <br />and the existing stability of a neighborhood prior to new affordable housing are more likely <br />to impact crime rates, these conclusions are more qualitative. <br />Concorn:Affordable housing does not belong here. <br />Reality: Some communities believe that affordable housing proposals would bring "new <br />poor" to their neighborhood. However, people paying more than 30% of their income on <br />housing (and making less than 80% of the Area Median Income) most likely live in the area. <br />In our region, nearly every community has such residents. Additional affordable housing of <br />all kinds is needed everywhere, from rural centers to emerging suburban subdivisions to <br />older suburbs and the urban center. <br />ONE� Housing mmrmGrowing, 7hrivinqgegion <br />