My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/28/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2016
>
Agenda - Council - 06/28/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:50:35 PM
Creation date
6/30/2016 8:32:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/28/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1098
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M1 <br />There are several distinct types of housing preservation. For example, preservation can <br />* The physical upgrading of housing, which could range from moderate tosubstantial <br />rehabilitation; this is the physical preservation of housing. <br />* Securing or extending long-term commitments from property owners to continue to <br />participate in o program such as project -based Section 8; this is preservation ofofederal <br />subsidy that creates affordability. <br />* Establishing or continuing rent and income restrictions making units affordable over the <br />long term; this is preservation of housing affordability. <br />Key prioritiesfor preservation include the region\u chronically underfunded public housing <br />stock and the region\ularge stock ofproject-based Section8propertiea.W1anyoftheoe <br />are nearing the end of the useful life of major building oyatenna or contractual obligations <br />for affordability. In practice, particularly for existing publicly subsidized housing, failing to <br />take action 0n8property inone 0[more 0fthese "preservation dinnenoi0no''could have 8 <br />harmful effect. For example, an owner ofa multifamily property with existing project -based <br />Section 8 assistance may have deferred maintenance requirements that must be addressed <br />to pass the inspection required to participate in the Section 8 program. If the housing <br />fails to pass inspection and is unable to continue in the Section 8 program, or if an owner <br />prepays a maturing HUD mortgage and tenants are not provided housing choice vouchers, <br />federal dollars that could come to our region are lost. Moreover, the owner now has a major <br />decision to make: <br />p Let the property further deteriorate <br />and hope that the low-income <br />tenants will produce enough rental <br />revenue to keep the property <br />inoperation, even when capital <br />improvement needs gounaddressed <br />and/or building operations and <br />maintenance services are pared <br />back. <br />p Upgrade the property and convert <br />it to a "market -rate" property that <br />produces higher unoubodizedrents <br />that may price -out existing tenants. <br />� Sell the property onthe open <br />market. (This may 0[may not preserve the housing <br />low- and moderate -income households.) <br />* Seek public funds for the property's rehabilitation and keep the housing affordable. <br />or the housing's affordability to <br />If the owner chooses any one of the first three options, there may or may not be a financial <br />profit or loss, but all three would likely result in the loss of subsidized units and the loss <br />of federal project -based rental subsidy funds. Not only does this leave federal dollars that <br />could have come to the region on the table, but under all three scenarios households will <br />fWo:omwrmmes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.