My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/28/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2016
>
Agenda - Council - 06/28/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:50:35 PM
Creation date
6/30/2016 8:32:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/28/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1098
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
tract, usinci the same data sources described above for Indicator #3. We then adiust the <br />resultinci numbers for consistencv with the communitv-level estimates develODed in Indicator <br />#3 as well as housina unit and household counts from the 2010 Census. To convert tracts <br />to station areao, we calculate the share of each tnact\u houoinq units and households that <br />reside in 8qiven station area using block -level data from the2010 Census and vveightthe <br />tract -level data accordincilv. <br />While point data are available for parcels (covering affnrdmbec. C//mv;nshiphousing units\, <br />allowina more Drecise locations of affordable ownershiD housina units than census tracts. <br />uoinqthe adiuoted tract -level estimates described here makes the different data sources <br />more cornparab|e. the finest level, ofgyeographic detail available in the Cl |A8 data (covering <br />aff�J(dobh; ur�A3 mnd households) io thu munots4ra«�. VVu om|mu|mtstta3*na�u cif umc� <br />tract'a housing unito &nd houoehn|dathmt in & given ut&tion wne& u&�ng <br />data from thC2O1OC <br />Amendment, p'10: <br />$50,520 $50.250 [50% of the Area Median Income for a six -person household] <br />Amendment, p'18: <br />This suggests that meeting the 2021-2030 need for housing units affordable to households <br />earning 50Y60fAW1|and below would require over $5billion insubsidy over the decade 0r <br />over $500 million a year, far less more than the available resources. <br />Amendment, p.18: <br />The availability of land that can support affordable housing gives developers a variety of <br />geographic choices to consider for a affordable housing development; developers building <br />affordable housing across the region give low- and moderate -income households viable <br />options aotowhere they live. <br />Amendment, p'19: <br />9,550 housing units for households earning from 51 % to 80% of AMI (assuming a 5% <br />vacancy rate in this band.) <br />Amendment, p'24: <br />For context, of the multifamily affordable units built between 2003 and 2013 in developments <br />with atleast four units affordable at00Y6AW1|orless, the average project denoitvvvaornore <br />than 49 39 units per acre. The Council recognizes that flexibility is an important component <br />of housing elements and that the rninirnunn densities provided be|0vv are significantly |0vver <br />than that average of 4-9 39 units per acre. <br />HOUSING POLICY PLAN Appendices <br />205 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.