Agenda - Council - 10/13/1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT JOSEPH J. O'LEA/IY I. That Mr. Joseph J. O'Leary, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant", has applied for a conditional use permit to ope~'ate a welding and repair business from his home in the R-1R Rural Residential district. 2. That the Applicant appeared before the Ramsey Planning and Zoning Commission for a public hearing pursuant to Section 170.013D of the Ramsey City Code on October 6, 1987 and that said public hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated as a part of these findings by reference. 3. That the subject property is generally known as 7799 159th Lane N.W. and is legally described as follows: Lot 10, Block 1, Sorteberg's Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota. 4. That the subject property is located in the R-iR Rural Residential district and is approximately 2.5 acres in size. 5. That the Applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to operate a welding and repair business from his home on the subject property. 6. That the Applicant has stated that he has no employees on the subject property and that he stores two trucks and his equipment on the subject property. 7. That the Applicant has stated that he uses the subject property for telephone number and mailing address purposes for his business. 8. That a welding and repair business is not a permitted use in the R-IR Rural Residential district. 9. That the adjacent properties are also located in the R-iR Rural Residential district. 10. That there are no other similar pe~-mitted conditional uses in the area. 11. That the Applicant has stated that no customers come to the subject property for his business; the Applicant goes out to his customers. 12. That the proposed use will not increase the traffic to the area. i3. That the proposed use will not be unduly dangerous or detrimental to p~rscns residing in the area. 14. That the proposed use will not substantially impair the use or enjoyment of surrounding properties. 15. That the proposed use will not be harmonious with the specific objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 16. That the proposed use will be operated and maintained so that it is harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the intended character of the neighborhood.