Laserfiche WebLink
5. That the access to the subject property from Highway 10 is located <br />within Safety Zone A of the proposed Gateway North Industrial Airport <br />Zoning Ordinance. <br /> <br />6. That the Applicant is proposing to construct and operate a commercial <br />asphalt bituminous plant on the subject property. <br /> <br />7. That a commercial asphalt bituminous plant is not a permitted use in <br /> the I-1 IndusariaI district. <br /> <br />8. That the proposed plant will require silos and conveyors of <br />approximately 65 feet in height. <br /> <br />9. That due to the location of the proposed use on the subject property, <br />the proposed use does not appear to impact the airspace Of the airport. <br /> <br />I0. That :he adjacen= proper-'y :o the wes:, ess: and north is located in <br />the I-1 Industrial district. <br /> <br />11. That the adjacent property across the railroad tracks to the south is <br />located in the B-1 Business district. <br /> <br />12. That the previous occupant on the subject property was a concrete pipe <br />production plant. <br /> <br />13. That the proposed use will be in operation from approximately April <br />through November of eaca year and the plant will run approximately 9 hours <br />per day while in operation. <br /> <br />14. That the proposed use will be regulated by the Minnesota Pollution <br />Control Agency and the Environmental Protection Agency. <br /> <br />I5. That the proposed use will create additional truck traffic to and from <br />the subject property by appoximately 15-17 trucks per hour when the plant <br />is operating. <br /> <br />16. That access to the subject property will be from U.S. Highway 10 and/or <br />County Road 116 and these accesses are .~ubject to approval by Burlington <br />Northern, MnDOT, Anoka County and the City of Ramsey. <br /> <br />17. That an adjacent property owner, Mr. Ed Hamilton, has stated that he is <br />opposed to the Applicant's reRuest because of the increase in truck traffic <br />on U.S. Highway 10. <br /> <br />18. That in a letter dated August 24, 1987, Joseph and Mary Jo Sentyrz, <br />6740 Highway 10 N.W., stated that they are opposed to the.Applicant's <br />request because cf concerns regarding potential health hazards and air <br />quality concerns posed by the proposed use and increase in truck traffic on <br />Righway 10. <br /> <br />19. That on September 9, 1987 the Ramsey Airport Commission reviewed the <br />Applcant's request and had the following comments: <br /> <br />Will the proximity of the proposed use to the airport create a <br />safety hazard, particularly with respect to visibility, for <br />users of the airport? <br /> <br /> <br />