My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/08/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2016
>
Agenda - Council - 08/08/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:51:44 PM
Creation date
8/5/2016 11:18:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/08/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
elevation of the structure in relation to OHW. Comments received from the Environmental <br /> Policy Board and the DNR were reviewed. She explained staff recommended approval of the <br /> front yard variance setback, and allowing a second driveway on the property located at 14301 <br /> Neon St NW, contingent upon the Applicant providing an updated survey confirming that the <br /> proposed location is outside the Shore Impact Zone as well as the assumed elevation differences <br /> noted in the case, subject to survey and elevation. <br /> Citizen Input <br /> Chair Stevenson believed the request met the three considerations for a variance. He stated this <br /> was a very odd shaped lot. He requested comment from the other commissions on their thoughts. <br /> Commissioner Bauer asked who would own the private drive. <br /> Community Development Intern Meyers reported the private drive would be collectively owned <br /> by those that are serviced by the drive. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill reported the driveway would have a cross access <br /> easement. <br /> Greg Binfet, 14301 Neon Street, reported he purchased his home three years ago. He understood <br /> that he would have access to the driveway, along with the other properties and that the driveway <br /> had to be maintained privately. <br /> Commissioner Bauer requested further information on the ordinary high water line. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill stated the engineering department reviewed this <br /> request but did not put note flood information on the elevations. <br /> Commissioner Bauer was not concerned with the request and was glad to see the old oaks would <br /> be reserved. <br /> Commissioner Andrusko questioned what the recommendation from the Environmental Policy <br /> Board(EPB)was. <br /> Community Development Intern discussed the recommendation of the EPB in further detail <br /> noting the group recommended the applicant complete another survey. <br /> Further discussion ensued regarding the ordinary high water line. <br /> Commissioner VanScoy asked why the building had been turned 90 degrees. <br /> Mr. Binfet discussed the original plan noting the change was made to hide the garage in a <br /> wooded area and would save three very old oak trees. In addition, the proposed location would <br /> Planning Commission/June 2, 2016 <br /> Page 3 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.