Laserfiche WebLink
1. Broader Citizen Engagement?A key discussion topic in developing this survey was public involvement due <br /> to the high level of involvement in previous iterations of the plan. The City did hold a public workshop to <br /> gather ideas;however attendance was low and feedback was minimal. While this feedback provided a lot of <br /> good information, the format did not engage as many of the pubic as Staff desired. Staff would recommend <br /> using remaining City events, such as Happy Days and The Draw Event Series,to provide opportunities to <br /> submit ideas and review any potential amendments to the plan in addition to standard processes. <br /> 2. Broader Stakeholder Engagement? Similar to above, Staff would like to engage property owners impacted by <br /> the current plan and any potential amendments. Staff would like to review the results of this survey with <br /> stakeholders for feedback. Staff would present a simplified version of this survey for these stakeholders. <br /> 3. Direct the Planning Comimission to develop a revised Development Plan for The COR. This step only needs <br /> to be as in depth as needed. It is possible that amendments only need to go so far to provide clarity that <br /> appears to be currently lacking in the plan. As noted previously, Staff also desires to simplify design <br /> requirements to make the document more easy for all to navigate and comprehend. Plan Amendments would <br /> also be reviewed by all City policy boards that participated in the survey. <br /> Timeframe: <br /> 1 hour <br /> Funding Source: <br /> This case is being handled as part of normal Staff duties. Staff supplemented its work by having WSB and <br /> Associates, the City's consulting planner,manage the survey input and review process. <br /> Responsible Party(ies): <br /> Community Development Director <br /> Outcome: <br /> Provide feedback on survey findings. Provide direction to Staff on the following: <br /> 1. Is additional citizen engagement desired? <br /> 2. Is an amendment to the Development Plan desired? <br /> Attachments <br /> Survey Results <br /> March 2016 Public Workshop Comments <br /> Original Comparison Document <br /> Form Review <br /> Inbox Reviewed By Date <br /> Kurt Ulrich Kurt Ulrich 07/07/2016 01:01 PM <br /> Form Started By:Tim Gladhill Started On:07/06/2016 02:55 PM <br /> Final Approval Date:07/07/2016 <br />